Classical structural biology equates function with a fixed three-dimensional fold, a view challenged by intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and regions (IDRs), which populate broad conformational ensembles rather than a unique structure. This article introduces the “disordome” paradigm, extending Uversky’s “unfoldome” to describe how function emerges from electrostatic and hydration landscapes that reshape reversibly upon encounter with a partner. Using α-synuclein binding to ganglioside-enriched rafts and IDR-driven liquid–liquid phase separation, we argue that transient folding-upon-binding events, potentially entropically cheap, generate information-rich complexes and condensates that dissolve once conditions change, consistent with the second law of thermodynamics. We trace this logic to overlooked precursors: in 1957 Klotz invoked rubber elasticity to introduce entropy as the driver of protein “disorientation”, while in 1962 Bernal described such proteins as chains “coiled in different ways” and formulated a “two-atom rule” whereby bonding constraints fix atomic geometry only up to two atoms apart. We argue that the local under-determination described by this two-atom rule, left unresolved in IDPs by any conserved network of contacts, helps explain why AlphaFold fails on IDPs. A quantum-mechanical pillar (dispersion, OH–π contacts, tunneling) is proposed as underrepresented in IDP research. We discuss implications for the origin of life, cellular regulation via condensates, and a therapeutic logic (“target the target, not the arrow”) illustrated by AmyP53, which occupies raft gangliosides rather than disordered amyloid proteins in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fantini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: