Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) systems based on ϕ-OTDR are increasingly used for real-time infrastructure monitoring, but their performance is limited by coherent and polarization fading, which create signal blind spots along the fiber. This study evaluates two coherent-detection DAS architectures—with and without polarization diversity—together with the influence of optical cable type and ground-coupling method, in an operational railway environment. Field experiments were conducted along a 40 km SNCF (Société Nationale des Chemins de fer Français) railway line using train passages as excitation sources, complemented by controlled sledgehammer tap tests on a 500 m calibration platform connecting four fiber configurations (telecom vs. sensing cables, buried vs. duct-installed). Signal amplitude, differential phase, and phase Median Absolute Deviation (MAD) were used to quantify sensing performance. Polarization diversity reduced the fraction of faded signals below −40dB from approximately ≈8.4% to ≈1% of the fiber length and improved the Phase Stability Index (PSI) from ≈6dB to ≈10dB at 20 km, significantly mitigating polarization-induced signal dropouts across the 40 km span. Among the tested cables, the tight-buffered sensing fiber directly buried in the ground consistently provided the strongest and most stable response, while telecom fiber installed in a High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) duct showed the weakest coupling. These results demonstrate that combining polarization-diversity detection with an optimized fiber-cable coupling strategy substantially improves the robustness of DAS for railway infrastructure monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chedid et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: