Aims To compare serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) levels between Syrian patients with oral or laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and healthy controls and examine their association with baseline clinicopathological characteristics. Methods This analytical cross-sectional study included 60 treatment-naïve patients with histologically confirmed oral or laryngeal SCC and 30 healthy controls. Serum SCC-Ag levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Differences in SCC-Ag levels according to clinicopathological characteristics were assessed using non-parametric tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed apparent discrimination between patients with SCC and healthy controls. Exploratory multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between SCC-Ag and advanced clinical stage or nodal metastasis after adjustment for age, sex, smoking status, and tumour site. Results Median SCC-Ag levels were higher in patients with SCC than in healthy controls (1.450 vs 0.914 ng/mL; P < .001). Median levels were 1.508 ng/mL in oral SCC and 1.203 ng/mL in laryngeal SCC. The apparent AUC for all SCC cases versus healthy controls was 0.849 (95% CI, 0.754-0.931), with an exploratory Youden-derived cutoff of 1.13 ng/mL yielding 86.7% sensitivity and 70.0% specificity. The optimism-corrected AUC after 2,000 stratified bootstrap resamples was 0.848. Higher SCC-Ag levels were associated with advanced T category, nodal metastasis, distant metastasis, and advanced clinical stage. In exploratory adjusted models, SCC-Ag was associated with advanced clinical stage (adjusted OR, 2.08 per 0.1 ng/mL increase; 95% CI, 1.41-3.07; P < .001) and nodal metastasis (adjusted OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.38; P = .017). Conclusion Serum SCC-Ag levels were higher in patients with oral or laryngeal SCC and were associated with baseline disease extent. These preliminary findings support further investigation of SCC-Ag as an adjunct biomarker of disease burden. However, the apparent ROC performance and exploratory associations do not establish diagnostic or prognostic utility in routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alhajjar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: