Why the study?
Limited doctor-to-patient ratios in developing regions motivate low-cost machine-learning-based screening tools for cardiovascular disease prediction.
Does a feature-engineered and systematically hyperparameter-tuned Random Forest model improve the accuracy and discrimination of heart disease prediction compared to baseline and historical machine learning models?
Does a feature-engineered and systematically hyperparameter-tuned Random Forest model improve the accuracy and discrimination of heart disease prediction compared to baseline and historical machine learning models?
Absolute Event Rate: 90.24% vs 88.29%
A domain-informed, rigorously tuned Random Forest model successfully maximizes heart disease prediction accuracy on the Cleveland dataset, providing a highly discriminative and easily deployable tool for low-cost clinical screening.
High-accuracy tuned RF model with engineered features shows promise for prediction; leaves open prospective validation before any clinical use.
Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and limited doctor-to-patient ratios in developing regions spur low-cost machine-learning-based screening tools. This article does a review and case study of supervised learning approaches to heart disease prediction using UCI/Cleveland dataset. The five previously reported technique families in the literature are K-Nearest Neighbour, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression and untuned Random Forest. These families are reviewed and benchmarked against a proposed Random Forest that is rigorously tuned. The pipeline that is proposed extends the initial 13 clinical parameters to 21 clinical parameters by the addition of 8 domain-informed engineered features. A custom RandomizedSearchCV with 5-fold stratified cross-validation (30 combinations, 150 fits) is applied. The system is deployed as a real-time Flask web application. An ablation study analyzes the contribution of feature engineering and hyperparameter tuning to the final result. The tuned model is able to achieve a test accuracy of 90.24% and a ROC-AUC of 92.64%. The accuracy achieved is higher than or equal to that of the best performing models reported during the literature review, while at the same time providing 5-fold cross-validated performance (91.59% ± 1.94%), a full complement of multi-metrics evaluation, Gini-based feature-importance ranking, and end-to-end deployment interface all of which were largely absent from the reviewed literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bala et al. (2026) studied Heart disease (n=1,025). Feature-optimized and hyperparameter-tuned Random Forest model vs. Untuned (default) Random Forest model was evaluated on Test accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: