Key result
Higher educational attainment was associated with more favorable cardiometabolic profiles, including a significantly reduced risk of overweight or obesity in university-educated women compared to primary-educated women (OR 0.34).
Why the study?
Socioeconomic inequalities in cardiovascular risk persist despite declining mortality, necessitating examination of risk factors and lifestyle behaviors across educational levels in a Mediterranean population.
Does higher educational attainment improve cardiovascular risk profiles and lifestyle behaviors in adults without prior cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=943)
No
Does higher educational attainment improve cardiovascular risk profiles and lifestyle behaviors in adults without prior cardiovascular disease?
Odds Ratio: 0.34 (95% CI 0.2–0.56)
Absolute Event Rate: 37.8% vs 69.8%
Higher educational attainment is associated with significantly healthier lifestyles and favorable cardiometabolic risk profiles, with educational gradients affecting a broader spectrum of risk factors in women compared to men.
Higher education links to better cardiometabolic profiles in Mediterranean adults; hypothesis-generating for socioeconomic CV interventions.
Background: Socioeconomic inequalities in cardiovascular risk persist despite declining mortality. We examined the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle behaviors across educational levels in men and women from a Mediterranean population. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of adults aged 35–74 years from a population-based sample in north-eastern Spain. Risk factors and lifestyle were assessed with standardized measurements and validated questionnaires. Educational attainment was categorized as primary, secondary, or university. Analyses were sex-stratified; age-adjusted linear and logistic regression models were applied. Results: We included 943 adults (52.3% women). Among men, secondary and university education (vs. primary) were associated with lower LDL-cholesterol [β –11.76 (95% CI –21.68 to –1.83) and –17.83 (–28.03 to –7.63) mg/dL], lower odds of hypercholesterolemia [OR = 0.43 (0.20–0.90) for both], smoking [OR = 0.57 (0.33–0.97) and 0.53 (0.30–0.95)], and higher odds of high Mediterranean diet adherence [OR = 2.08 (1.04–4.16) and 3.05 (1.51–6.14)]. Among women, secondary and university education (vs. primary) were associated with lower body mass index [β –1.81 (–2.85 to –0.77) and –2.52 (–3.63 to –1.40) kg/m2] and lower odds of overweight/obesity [OR = 0.47 (0.29–0.76) and 0.34 (0.20–0.56)]. Lower odds of hypertension [OR = 0.44 (0.22–0.87)] and high Mediterranean diet adherence [OR = 2.14 (1.12–4.09)] were also more likely in university-educated women. Conclusions: Higher educational attainment was associated with healthier lifestyles and more favorable cardiometabolic profiles. Educational gradients were broader in women—spanning adiposity, blood pressure, glycemia, and lipidemia—whereas, in men, they mainly affected lipidemia and diet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Álamo-Junquera et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk factors (n=943). Higher educational attainment (secondary or university) vs. Primary education was evaluated on Overweight/obesity in women (university vs. primary education) (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20-0.56). Higher educational attainment was associated with more favorable cardiometabolic profiles, including a significantly reduced risk of overweight or obesity in university-educated women compared to primary-educated women (OR 0.34).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: