Key result
Severe neighborhood disadvantage is linked to ~76% higher 30-day heart failure readmission risk.
Why the study?
Neighborhood-level social determinants of health influence cardiovascular outcomes, but their association with post-discharge healthcare utilization in HFpEF remains incompletely defined.
Is neighborhood environment associated with time-dependent patterns of post-discharge healthcare utilization in patients with HFpEF?
Cohort (n=6,702)
No
Is neighborhood environment associated with time-dependent patterns of post-discharge healthcare utilization in patients with HFpEF?
Neighborhood socioeconomic environment significantly influences distinct, time-dependent post-discharge utilization trajectories in HFpEF, highlighting the potential value of tailoring early vs. extended follow-up interventions to community-level determinants.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform neighborhood-stratified discharge planning in HFpEF; hypothesis-generating for timed interventions.
Background: Neighborhood-level social determinants of health influence cardiovascular outcomes; however, their association with post-discharge healthcare utilization in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains incompletely defined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 6,702 adults hospitalized for HFpEF (2014 to 2022). Patients were assigned to one of the four neighborhood environments (NEnv-1 to NEnv-4) using a validated clustering framework based on ZIP code-level socioeconomic variables. The primary outcome was time to first HF readmission, evaluated within prespecified post-discharge intervals (0-30 days, >30-90 days, and >90-365 days). The secondary outcomes included HF-related healthcare re-encounters and HF hospitalization burden (0, 1, or ≥2 admissions). Cox proportional hazard and multinomial logistic regression models were used. Results: Neighborhood environment was independently associated with post-discharge outcomes with distinct temporal patterns. Early (0-30 days) HF readmission risk was higher in NEnv-3 (aHR, 1.63) and NEnv-4 (aHR, 1.76), with similar increases in HF-related re-encounters (aHR, 1.72 and 1.84) persisting through the >30-90-day interval. In contrast, NEnv-2 demonstrated a delayed-risk pattern, with the highest risk occurring in the >90-365-day interval (readmission aHR, 3.42; re-encounter aHR, 3.45). All non-reference environments were associated with a higher likelihood of at least one post-index HF admission (aOR range, 1.84-2.24). NEnv-4 uniquely demonstrated a higher odds of recurrent hospitalization (≥2 vs. 1 admission; aOR, 1.64). Conclusions: Neighborhood environment is associated with distinct, time-dependent patterns of HF utilization in HFpEF, including early, delayed, and recurrent risks. Incorporating neighborhood context may help identify when patients with HFpEF are most vulnerable after discharge and guide the timing of post-discharge interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aleligne et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=6,702). Neighborhood environment (NEnv-4 vs NEnv-1) vs. Reference neighborhood environment (NEnv-1) was evaluated on Time to first heart failure readmission (0-30 days interval) (aHR 1.76, 95% CI 1.21-2.57, p=0.003). Compared to the reference environment, residence in the most disadvantaged multidimensional neighborhood environment (NEnv-4) was associated with an increased early risk of 30-day heart failure readmission (aHR 1.76).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: