Why the study?
Coronary vasomotor disorders are frequently underdiagnosed in women with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries, necessitating investigation of clinical presentation and treatment response.
Does calcium-channel blocker therapy improve symptoms in women with acetylcholine-confirmed coronary spasm?
Cohort (n=194)
No
Does calcium-channel blocker therapy improve symptoms in women with acetylcholine-confirmed coronary spasm?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights the high symptom burden and long diagnostic delay in women with INOCA driven by vasospasm, and supports the real-world effectiveness of calcium-channel blockers for symptom relief.
BACKGROUND: Coronary vasomotor disorders are frequently underdiagnosed in women with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries. We investigated clinical presentation, diagnostic delay, spasm subtype, and patient-reported treatment response in women with acetylcholine-confirmed coronary spasm. METHODS: This single-center observational study included women with a positive intracoronary acetylcholine provocation test who completed a locally developed questionnaire on symptoms, triggers, comorbidities, medication tolerance, and treatment response. Epicardial spasm was defined as ≥ 90% epicardial diameter reduction with symptom reproduction and ischemic ECG changes; microvascular spasm as symptoms and ischemic ECG changes with < 90% epicardial vasoconstriction. Diltiazem was initiated as first-line therapy, with amlodipine as an alternative. Regression analyses exploring therapeutic failure were considered exploratory because of the low event count. RESULTS: A total of 194 women were included (median age 60 years [IQR 52-67]). Chest pain/tightness was reported by 163/190 (85.8%), dyspnea by 70/135 (51.9%), and palpitations by 74/136 (54.1%). Epicardial/microvascular spasm was present in 110/187 (58.8%) and 77/187 (41.2%). Median symptom-to-diagnosis time was 24 months [IQR 8-90]. Diltiazem was prescribed in 162/194 (83.5%). Among respondents with follow-up data, symptom frequency decreased in 103/128 (80.5%), episode duration decreased in 91/118 (77.1%), and pain intensity decreased/resolved in 92/115 (80.0%). Therapeutic failure occurred in 8/106 (7.5%). Residual symptom burden remained common, with CCS class > II at follow-up in 65/124 (52.4%) and persistent complaints in 53/107 (49.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In women with acetylcholine-confirmed coronary spasm, symptom burden and diagnostic delay were substantial. Calcium-channel blocker therapy was associated with patient-reported symptom improvement among respondents with available follow-up data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sikulu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acetylcholine-confirmed coronary spasm (INOCA) (n=194). Calcium-channel blocker therapy (diltiazem or amlodipine) was evaluated on Therapeutic failure (no improvement in symptom frequency, episode duration, and pain intensity).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: