Key result
Intrinsic heart rate pacing unmasks stronger developmental electrophysiology patterns in pediatric atrial models vs fixed-rate pacing.
Why the study?
The contribution of age- and patient-specific heart rate to developmental changes in pediatric atrial electrophysiology was unresolved in prior transcriptomic-guided simulations.
Does patient-specific intrinsic heart rate modulate developmental electrophysiology compared to fixed-rate pacing in transcriptomic-guided in silico models of pediatric human atrial cardiomyocytes?
Does patient-specific intrinsic heart rate modulate developmental electrophysiology compared to fixed-rate pacing in transcriptomic-guided in silico models of pediatric human atrial cardiomyocytes?
Pediatric atrial electrophysiology reflects a complex interaction between intrinsic developmental transcriptomic remodeling and rate-dependent modulation, highlighting the importance of considering patient-specific heart rates in models of cardiac maturation.
Patient-specific rates may refine pediatric atrial models; extends fixed-rate simulations but remains hypothesis-generating without clinical validation.
Cardiac electrophysiology adapts throughout pediatric development, driven by factors including age-associated ion channel expression changes and decreasing heart rate. Our prior transcriptomic-guided simulations of human atrial cardiomyocytes predicted developmental-associated changes in electrophysiology biomarkers at a fixed pacing rate, leaving the contribution of age- and patient-specific heart rate unresolved. In this study, we incorporated intrinsic heart rate into gene expression-guided computational models to predict the interaction between developmental maturation and pacing rate to shape atrial electrophysiology. Virtual patient-specific populations of atrial cardiomyocytes were generated from the right atrial cardiomyocyte gene expression data from 117 patients, spanning neonates to young adults. We simulated each population at pacing rates corresponding to each patient's intrinsic ECG-based heart rate and at fixed rates corresponding to the patient cohort minimum, median, and maximum. Action potential and calcium transient biomarkers were quantified, and partial least squares regression assessed key biomarker dependencies. For intrinsic-rate pacing conditions, action potential duration at 50% and 90% repolarization increased with age, whereas early repolarization shortened; maximum upstroke velocity increased, resting membrane potential became more negative, and alternans prevalence decreased. Developmental differences persisted during fixed-rate pacing conditions, indicating that differences were not explained solely by the faster heart rates of younger patients. Notably, intrinsic-rate simulations exhibited stronger age associations for upstroke velocity and alternans than fixed-rate simulations. Sensitivity analyses indicated that electrophysiological phenotypes arose from interactions among ionic conductances, calcium handling, age, and heart rate. Collectively, we find that pediatric atrial electrophysiology reflects both intrinsic developmental remodeling and rate-dependent modulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellks et al. (2026) studied Acyanotic congenital heart disease (n=117). Patient-specific intrinsic heart rate pacing vs. Fixed heart rate pacing (64, 119, and 171 beats/min) was evaluated on Simulated action potential and calcium transient biomarkers (e.g., APD50, APD90, early repolarization, and maximum upstroke velocity). Patient-specific intrinsic heart rate modulates simulated developmental electrophysiology in pediatric atrial cardiomyocytes, showing stronger age associations for upstroke velocity and alternans compared to fixed-rate pacing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: