Key result
Switching to asciminib is linked to increased arterial stiffness despite zero overt cardiovascular events.
Why the study?
The real-world vascular impact of asciminib and appropriate cardiovascular monitoring strategies in CP-CML patients switching from ATP-TKIs remain unclear.
Does switching from ATP-TKIs to asciminib affect arterial stiffness parameters and cardiovascular events in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia?
Observational (n=32)
No
Does switching from ATP-TKIs to asciminib affect arterial stiffness parameters and cardiovascular events in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia?
Switching to asciminib in patients with CP-CML did not result in clinically overt cardiovascular events but was associated with early increases in arterial stiffness, highlighting a potential need for vascular monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Potential vascular effects of asciminib warrant monitoring; leaves open long-term CV safety in CML without randomized data.
Background Among adenosine triphosphate-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ATP-TKIs) approved for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML), nilotinib and ponatinib are associated with a high incidence of vascular adverse events, and cardiovascular monitoring is recommended in current cardio-oncology guidelines. In contrast, monitoring strategies for asciminib, a recently approved specifically targets the myristoyl pocket (STAMP) inhibitor, have not been addressed, and its real-world vascular impact remains unclear. Purpose To compare surrogate markers of atherosclerosis before and after switching from ATP-TKIs to asciminib in patients with CP-CML. Method This single-centre retrospective observational study included patients with CP-CML followed at a dedicated cardio-oncology clinic. Patients switched from ATP-TKIs to asciminib were identified. Arterial stiffness parameters, including cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and ankle-brachial index (ABI), were assessed before and after the switch. Cardiovascular events during follow-up were recorded. Results Among 102 patients in the cardio-oncology database, 45 were switched to asciminib. Thirty-two patients had complete arterial stiffness data before and after switching. Mean age at switching was 59.4 ± 12.8 years, and 65% were male. Approximately half had hypertension. No cardiovascular events requiring therapeutic intervention occurred during follow-up. ABI showed no significant change. In contrast, CAVI, a marker of arterial stiffness, showed a significant increase after asciminib initiation. Before switching, 21 patients had normal values (<8.0), 5 were borderline (8.0–8.9), and 6 were abnormal (≥9.0). Only one patient worsened from the normal to abnormal range. Conclusion Asciminib was not associated with clinically overt cardiovascular events in this cohort; however, a significant increase in arterial stiffness as assessed by CAVI was observed after treatment initiation. Given the age dependency of CAVI, causality cannot be confirmed. Larger studies are warranted to determine whether early increases in arterial stiffness are associated with future cardiovascular events and to clarify the need for vascular monitoring in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyazaki et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (n=32). Asciminib vs. Baseline (prior ATP-TKI therapy) was evaluated on Arterial stiffness parameters (CAVI and ABI) and cardiovascular events. Switching to asciminib resulted in no overt cardiovascular events during follow-up, though a significant increase in arterial stiffness measured by the cardio-ankle vascular index was observed.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: