Key result
Weekend cardiac surgery is linked to ~50% higher mortality compared to weekday procedures.
Why the study?
The impact of weekend hospital care on outcomes after cardiac surgery remains unclear, necessitating a comprehensive assessment of the weekend effect in this population.
Does weekend cardiac surgery increase perioperative mortality and intensive care unit length of stay compared to weekday surgery in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=527,195)
Yes
Does weekend cardiac surgery increase perioperative mortality and intensive care unit length of stay compared to weekday surgery in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Odds Ratio: 1.5 (95% CI 1.2–1.8)
p-value: p=.001
Weekend cardiac surgery is associated with a 50% increased odds of perioperative mortality and longer ICU stays compared to weekday surgery, independent of patient case mix.
Weekend cardiac surgery was associated with higher mortality and longer ICU stay; extends observational evidence but leaves open systemic drivers pending prospective data.
Objectives The "weekend effect" describes worse outcomes with weekend hospital care, but its impact on cardiac surgery remains unclear. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis and meta-regression to assess whether weekend cardiac surgery is associated with poorer perioperative outcomes than weekday procedures. Methods PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies comparing weekend versus weekday cardiac surgery outcomes. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences with 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed by procedure type (emergent, coronary artery bypass grafting, acute type A aortic dissection) and geographic region. Meta-regressions explored effects of mean age, percentage of female patients, proportion of emergent cases, and publication year. A day-by-day mortality heat map was constructed to assess daily trends. Results Seventeen studies comprising 527,195 patients were included; 7.4% underwent surgery on weekends. Weekend surgery was associated with significantly greater mortality (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8; P = .001) and longer stay in the intensive care unit (mean difference, 0.4 days; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7; P = .01). No significant differences were found for acute kidney injury, stroke, aortic crossclamp time, reoperation for bleeding, or total hospital stay. The incidence of transient ischemic attack was slightly lower on weekends (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0; P = .02). Subgroup analyses showed consistently elevated mortality in weekend cases across emergent, coronary artery bypass grafting, and acute type A aortic dissection subgroups, and in studies from Asia and the United States but not Europe. Meta-regression showed no significant effect of age, sex, emergent case proportion, or publication year on mortality differences. Conclusions Weekend cardiac surgery is associated with greater mortality and longer stay in the intensive care unit, independent of case mix. The absence of patient-level effect modification suggests that systemic or institutional factors, rather than patient acuity, underlie the weekend effect, supporting the need for policies ensuring consistent care across all days.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiac surgery (n=527,195). Weekend cardiac surgery vs. Weekday cardiac surgery was evaluated on mortality (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8, p=.001). Weekend cardiac surgery was associated with significantly greater mortality compared with weekday procedures (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.2-1.8; P=.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: