Key result
Study provides no quantitative outcomes on healthcare professionals' stroke prevention knowledge or practices in Nigeria.
Why the study?
Understanding healthcare professionals’ perceptions and practices regarding stroke prevention is crucial to improving patient outcomes and reducing stroke burden in resource-limited settings such as Nigeria.
Cross-Sectional
No
Stroke burden data in Nigeria remain limited; leaves open need for prospective studies to guide prevention.
Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of mortality and a major contributor to global disability, with stroke accounting for a significant proportion of this burden. Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide, responsible for approximately 10% of all deaths, claiming 5.5 million lives annually, and resulting in 44 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost. Sub-Saharan Africa, including Nigeria, exhibits some of the highest age-standardized incidence rates, with stroke contributing significantly to medical admissions, high 30-day case fatality rates (28–37%), and functional disability rates exceeding 60%. The long-term disabilities associated with stroke impose substantial emotional, social, and economic challenges on patients, caregivers, and health systems. Addressing these challenges aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals, which aim to reduce premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by one-third by 2030, strengthen prevention and treatment strategies, and promote universal health coverage. Understanding healthcare professionals’ perceptions and practices regarding stroke prevention is crucial to improving patient outcomes, reducing the burden of disease, and enhancing public health strategies in resource-limited settings
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eze et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Stroke. Healthcare professionals' knowledge and practices was evaluated. The provided abstract outlines the background burden of stroke in Nigeria but reports no quantitative study outcomes regarding healthcare professionals' knowledge or practices.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: