Key result
Higher cfDNA concentration is linked to ~5% lower risk of cardiovascular endpoint events.
Why the study?
The utility of circulating free DNA epigenetic characteristics for cardiac function stratification and risk prediction in cardiovascular disease patients was not established.
Does circulating free DNA (cfDNA) epigenetic typing accurately predict severe cardiac dysfunction and risk in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Observational (n=624)
Does circulating free DNA (cfDNA) epigenetic typing accurately predict severe cardiac dysfunction and risk in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Odds Ratio: 0.946 (95% CI 0.893–0.997)
p-value: p=0.0443
Epigenetic profiling of circulating free DNA provides a highly accurate, noninvasive molecular marker that, when combined with traditional clinical indicators, significantly improves risk stratification for cardiac dysfunction.
cfDNA concentration was associated with fewer CVD events; leaves open added value for risk stratification pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of circulating free DNA (cfDNA) epigenetic characteristics in cardiac function stratification and risk prediction in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: This retrospective study included 624 CVD patients diagnosed from January 2023 to January 2025. Patients were grouped according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification into mild (I-II) and severe (III-IV) cardiac insufficiency groups. Genome-wide methylation level, hypermethylation proportion, and "risk-type cfDNA" (defined by hypermethylation of cardioprotective gene promoters and hypomethylation of injury-promoting gene promoters) were assessed. Logistic regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost models were constructed to identify predictors of severe cardiac dysfunction. RESULTS: Severe cardiac dysfunction was significantly associated with higher genome-wide methylation levels, hypermethylation proportion, and risk-type cfDNA (all P < 0.05). cfDNA concentration was an independent protective factor for endpoint events (OR = 0.946, 95% CI: 0.893-0.997, P = 0.0443). The combined model (cfDNA + left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] + N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] + age) achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.994. Machine learning models identified age, cfDNA concentration, and LVEF as the top three predictors of severe cardiac dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Epigenetic characteristics of cfDNA are closely associated with the severity of cardiac dysfunction in CVD patients and may serve as effective noninvasive molecular markers for cardiac function stratification. Integrating cfDNA epigenetic features with traditional clinical indicators significantly improves risk prediction accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease (n=624). cfDNA epigenetic characteristics and concentration was evaluated on Endpoint events (OR 0.946, 95% CI 0.893-0.997, p=0.0443). Higher cfDNA concentration was independently associated with a lower risk of endpoint events (OR 0.946; 95% CI 0.893-0.997; P=0.0443) in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: