Key result
Combined high CAVI and BNP linked to ~9.7-fold higher odds of stage B HF.
Why the study?
The clinical significance of cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) in stage A/B heart failure patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus was unclear.
Cross-Sectional (n=292)
No
Odds Ratio: 9.72 (95% CI 3.24–19.92)
p-value: p=<0.001
Combining the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI >9.0) and BNP (>34.0 pg/mL) may serve as a useful screening tool to distinguish subclinical structural heart disease (stage B HF) from stage A HF in patients with type 2 diabetes.
May support combined CAVI-BNP screening for stage B HF in T2DM; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a medical condition with a poor prognosis; therefore, it is important to consider treatment strategies from the pre-onset stage, i.e., at stage A/B HF. However, in addition to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) being a risk factor for HF, it has also been reported that the prognosis of HF is worse among patients with T2DM than among those without it. This cross-sectional study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), an indicator of arterial stiffness, in stage A/B HF patients with T2DM. Methods: In total, 292 stage A/B HF patients (113 men and 179 women) with T2DM were enrolled, and the relationships between CAVI and various clinical parameters were evaluated. Furthermore, cut-off values of CAVI and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) for distinguishing between stage A HF and stage B HF were determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve, and these two markers were employed in combination to distinguish stage A HF from stage B HF. Results: CAVI was significantly associated with various parameters in this study. Among them, multiple regression analyses indicated that 11 explanatory factors (calf circumference, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors use, E/e' ratio, skin autofluorescence, subendocardial viability ratio, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists use, age, decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate, coronary artery disease, stage B HF, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors use) were selected as independent variables for CAVI as the dependent variable (R2 = 0.663). However, CAVI and BNP thresholds for distinguishing stage A HF from stage B HF using the receiver operating characteristic curve were 9.0 and 34.0 pg/mL, respectively. In addition, compared to patients with low CAVI (≤ 9.0) and low BNP (≤ 34.0 pg/mL), those with high levels of both factors (CAVI > 9.0, BNP > 34.0 pg/mL) showed a 9.72-fold higher odds ratio (95% confidence interval: 3.24–19.92, P < 0.001). Conclusion: CAVI is significantly associated with early-stage HF in T2DM patients. Combining CAVI and BNP may provide a useful screening tool for subclinical HF risk stratification, although further prospective studies are required to elucidate causal relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takashi Hitsumoto (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Stage A/B Heart Failure with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (n=292). High cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI > 9.0) and high brain natriuretic peptide (> 34.0 pg/mL) vs. Low CAVI (≤ 9.0) and low BNP (≤ 34.0 pg/mL) was evaluated on Presence of stage B heart failure (OR 9.72, 95% CI 3.24-19.92, p=<0.001). The combination of high cardio-ankle vascular index (>9.0) and high brain natriuretic peptide (>34.0 pg/mL) was associated with a 9.72-fold higher odds of having stage B heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: