Key result
~58% of ED patients with Stage 2-range blood pressure lack a documented hypertension diagnosis.
Why the study?
The frequency of high blood pressure readings among emergency department patients without a documented diagnosis of hypertension was unclear.
Observational (n=66,624)
No
More than half of patients discharged from the emergency department with Stage 2-range blood pressure elevations lack a documented diagnosis of hypertension, identifying a critical missed opportunity for screening and outpatient referral.
BACKGROUND: High blood pressure readings (HBPRs) are common in emergency department (ED) patients, but the frequency of HBPRs among patients without a documented diagnosis of hypertension (DDxHTN) is unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of discharged ED encounters at a large Midwestern academic ED in 2024. HBPRs were defined as blood pressure ≥130 mmHg systolic or ≥80 mmHg diastolic. RESULTS: Among 66 624 discharged encounters with blood pressure data, 52 461 (78.7%) had at least one HBPR and 38 715 (58.1%) had at least one Stage 2-range HBPR (≥140/90 mmHg). Among patients with Stage 2-range HBPRs, 22 471 (58.0%) lacked DDxHTN. Older age, female sex, Black race, absence of interpreter need, and Medicare or Medicaid coverage were independently associated with DDxHTN. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of discharged ED patients with Stage 2-range HBPRs lacked DDxHTN, and many had only a single documented blood pressure. The ED may provide an opportunity for blood pressure reassessment and outpatient referral.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuhn et al. (2026) conducted an observational in High blood pressure (n=66,624). Stage 2-range high blood pressure readings (≥140/90 mmHg) was evaluated on Lack of documented diagnosis of hypertension (DDxHTN) among patients with Stage 2-range high blood pressure readings. Among emergency department patients with Stage 2-range high blood pressure readings, 58.0% lacked a documented diagnosis of hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: