Key result
Bovine pericardium yields ~4 mmHg higher 5-year aortic gradient than autologous pericardium in Ozaki procedures.
Why the study?
The comparative effectiveness of the Ozaki procedure using bovine pericardium versus autologous pericardium and stented bovine pericardial bioprosthesis has not been tested.
Does the Ozaki procedure using bovine pericardial tissue provide comparable hemodynamic performance and durability to the autologous Ozaki procedure and standard stented bovine pericardial bioprosthesis in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery?
Cohort (n=139)
Yes
Does the Ozaki procedure using bovine pericardial tissue provide comparable hemodynamic performance and durability to the autologous Ozaki procedure and standard stented bovine pericardial bioprosthesis in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 11% vs 7%
p-value: p=0.0013
The Ozaki procedure using bovine pericardium demonstrates excellent 5-year durability and comparable hemodynamics to stented bioprosthetic AVR, supporting its use when native pericardium is inadequate.
Bovine pericardium may offer a feasible Ozaki alternative in select patients; leaves open durability and comparative effectiveness for prospective study.
Objectives Using bovine pericardium allows the Ozaki procedure to be performed minimally invasively or in patients with abnormal pericardium, but its comparative effectiveness has not been tested. We compare hemodynamic performance and outcomes of the Ozaki procedure performed with bovine pericardium to (1) the original Ozaki procedure performed with autologous pericardium and (2) aortic valve replacement with a stented bovine pericardial bioprosthesis. Methods From 1/1/2007–5/1/2021, 48 patients underwent the Ozaki procedure with bovine pericardium at Toho University Ohashi Medical Center. Mean aortic valve gradient, aortic regurgitation grade, and freedom from reoperation were compared with those of 43 propensity-matched patients undergoing the Ozaki procedure with autologous pericardium and with 48 propensity-matched patients undergoing valve replacement with a bovine pericardial bioprosthesis at Cleveland Clinic from 1/1/2011–1/1/2022. Results In matched Ozaki patients receiving bovine versus autologous pericardium, mean gradients at 5 years were 11 versus 7.0 mmHg, respectively ( P =.0013), moderate/severe regurgitation was 0.0% versus 2.3%, and freedom from aortic valve reoperation was 100% for both. Comparing matched Ozaki patients receiving bovine pericardium with patients undergoing valve replacement, mean gradients at 5 years were 11 versus 11 mmHg, respectively ( P =.78), moderate/severe regurgitation was 0.0% versus 2.0%, and freedom from reoperation was 100% for both. Conclusions Use of bovine pericardium for the Ozaki procedure demonstrated slightly higher mean gradients compared with autologous pericardium, but outcomes are similar. These findings support continued use of the Ozaki procedure with bovine pericardium, particularly in cases with inadequate native pericardium and for minimally invasive approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tabrizi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve disease (n=139). Ozaki procedure with bovine pericardium vs. Ozaki procedure with autologous pericardium or aortic valve replacement was evaluated on Mean aortic valve gradient at 5 years (vs autologous pericardium) (p=0.0013). The Ozaki procedure with bovine pericardium had a higher mean aortic gradient at 5 years compared to autologous pericardium (11 vs 7.0 mmHg; P=0.0013), but similar freedom from reoperation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: