Key result
Retinal arterial wall reflectivity is not associated with incident cardiovascular disease.
Why the study?
The association between retinal arterial wall reflectivity and future cardiovascular disease in a large community-based cohort was unclear.
Is retinal arterial wall reflectivity associated with future incident cardiovascular disease in adults without a history of CVD?
Cohort (n=6,264)
Is retinal arterial wall reflectivity associated with future incident cardiovascular disease in adults without a history of CVD?
Hazard Ratio: 1.026 (95% CI 0.92–1.145)
Retinal arterial wall reflectivity measured by OCT is not independently associated with future incident cardiovascular disease in a general adult population, though exploratory data suggests potential value in those under 70.
Objective: To determine whether retinal arterial wall reflectivity is associated with future cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a large community-based Japanese cohort. Design: Community-based cohort study. Participants: A total of 6264 adults from the Nagahama Study (baseline 2012–2016) without a history of CVD. Methods: Retinal arterial wall reflectivity was measured on peripapillary OCT images at baseline. Participants were followed for approximately 7 years, and incident CVD events, including stroke and coronary artery disease (CAD), were identified through medical records. Associations were evaluated using Fine–Gray competing risk models and expressed as subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs). Retinal arterial caliber was included in multivariable analyses. Main Outcome Measures: Incident CVD events, including stroke and CAD. Results: During a mean follow-up of 6.7 years, 125 incident CVD events occurred. In the full cohort, retinal arterial wall reflectivity was not independently associated with CVD (SHR per 10 arbitrary units, 1.026; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920–1.145). A continuous age-by-reflectivity interaction was observed ( P = 0.029). In post hoc exploratory analyses among participants younger than 70 years, parsimonious models suggested possible associations with CVD (SHR, 1.173; 95% CI, 1.031–1.334) and stroke (SHR, 1.280; 95% CI, 1.088–1.506). Conclusions: Retinal arterial wall reflectivity was not independently associated with incident CVD in the full cohort. Post hoc exploratory analyses among participants younger than 70 years suggested possible modest associations with CVD, particularly stroke-related outcomes. These findings suggest that retinal arterial wall reflectivity may reflect subclinical vascular alterations, but require external validation. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=6,264). Retinal arterial wall reflectivity was evaluated on Incident CVD events, including stroke and CAD (SHR 1.026, 95% CI 0.920-1.145). Retinal arterial wall reflectivity was not independently associated with incident cardiovascular disease in the full cohort (SHR per 10 arbitrary units, 1.026; 95% CI 0.920-1.145).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: