Key result
Systematic review reveals substantial knowledge gaps in sex differences across cardiac sensory innervation.
Why the study?
Sex differences in cardiac pain manifestation are reported clinically, but the underlying anatomical differences in cardiac sensory innervation remain unclear.
Systematic Review (n=29)
This systematic review highlights a critical knowledge gap in the anatomical basis for sex-specific differences in cardiac pain presentation, emphasizing the need for dedicated research.
Current anatomical data fail to explain sex differences in cardiac pain; leaves open the need for dedicated sex-specific innervation studies.
PURPOSE: Sex differences in cardiac pain manifestation are reported in clinical studies, however, the underlying differences in the anatomy of cardiac sensory innervation remain unclear. METHODS: A systematic query across multiple datasets was conducted to extract all literature concerning anatomical studies on cardiac nociception with a focus on sex differences. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles passed the inclusion criteria. Most studies applied nerve stimulation and nerve tracing techniques to study cardiac sensory innervation. Cardiac afferent fibres carry sensory information into the brainstem and the cervical and thoracic spinal cord segments C1-T11 with a main contribution to spinal segments T1-T4. Cervical spinal segments C1-C2, vagus nerve (CN X), and trigeminal nerve (CN V) appear to play an important role in cardiac pain referral to the jaw, neck and face regions. Only five studies discussed potential anatomical sex differences of cardiac afferents. These studies show that women are more likely to experience central convergence of cardiac nociceptive inputs at cervical levels, yet the underlying anatomy remains unknown. Additionally, a menopause-related decline of cardiac sensory innervation may contribute to delayed diagnosis in women compared to men. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review highlights the paucity of literature describing sex differences in the cardiac viscerosensory system. Dedicated research is required to address this knowledge gap and improve our understanding of sex-specific cardiovascular symptom presentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Methorst et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Cardiac nociception and sex differences (n=29). Sex differences was evaluated on Anatomical differences in cardiac sensory innervation between sexes. A systematic review of 29 articles found only 5 discussed anatomical sex differences in cardiac afferents, indicating a significant knowledge gap in the cardiac viscerosensory system.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: