Key result
Isometric handgrip and dynamic exercise acutely increase heart rate and blood pressure.
Why the study?
Non-pharmacological interventions like physical exercise are first-line management for prehypertension, but isometric exercise's acute cardiovascular effects are not well characterized.
Does isometric handgrip exercise compared to high-intensity dynamic exercise differently affect acute heart rate and blood pressure responses in prehypertensive individuals?
Does isometric handgrip exercise compared to high-intensity dynamic exercise differently affect acute heart rate and blood pressure responses in prehypertensive individuals?
p-value: p=< 0.05
In prehypertensive individuals, isometric handgrip exercise induces greater acute blood pressure spikes, while high-intensity dynamic exercise produces greater acute heart rate elevations.
Hypothesis-generating for isometric handgrip responses in prehypertension; larger trials needed before any clinical consideration.
Introduction: Prehypertension is a major precursor to hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk. Non-pharmacological interventions particularly physical exercise has been considered as the first-line of management for prehypertension, but Isometric Exercise has not been favourably considered because of its association with exaggerated acute cardiovascular response. Aim: This study therefore investigated and compared the acute cardiovascular responses of Isometric handgrip exercise at various intensities and high-intensity dynamic physical exercise. Methods: An experimental study design was adopted, involving a total of 96 participants. The high-intensity dynamic exercise was football while the Isometric exercise is a handgrip exercise (IHE) at 30% and 50% Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC). Changes in cardiovascular parameters such as the heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were studied among prehypertensive individuals. These parameters were assessed at baseline, immediately after exercise, and during recovery periods. Results: All exercise modalities produced significant increases in HR, SBP, and DBP (p < 0.05). Dynamic exercise produced the greatest HR elevation (72.4 ± 6.7 to 154.8 ± 13.1 bpm) with the fastest recovery, whereas IHE at 50% MVC produced the highest SBP and DBP responses (approximately 160/110 mmHg) with delayed recovery. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that both forms of exercise produced significant acute cardiovascular responses in prehypertensive individuals, with the nature and magnitude of those responses determined primarily by exercise modality and contraction intensity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godsday et al. (2026) studied Prehypertension (n=96). Isometric handgrip exercise (IHE) vs. High-intensity dynamic physical exercise (football) was evaluated on Changes in heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (p=< 0.05). Both isometric handgrip and high-intensity dynamic exercises produced significant acute increases in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: