Key result
Noradrenergic phenotype is linked to ~3.6-fold higher odds of atherosclerotic complications versus adrenergic phenotype.
Why the study?
The cardiovascular effects of adrenaline-producing versus noradrenergic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma phenotypes are different and not well characterized.
Does the catecholamine phenotype in patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma affect the type of cardiovascular complications?
Cohort (n=341)
Does the catecholamine phenotype in patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma affect the type of cardiovascular complications?
In patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, the noradrenergic phenotype predisposes to atherosclerotic complications, while the adrenergic phenotype is associated with type 2 myocardial infarction and takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High incidence of serious cardiovascular complications warrants clinical vigilance; observational data leaves open phenotype-specific risk stratification needs.
Background Adrenaline-producing tumors are mostly characterized by a sudden release of catecholamines with episodic symptoms. Noradrenergic ones are usually less symptomatic and characterized by a continuous overproduction of catecholamines that are released into the bloodstream. Their effects on the cardiovascular system can thus be different. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of cardiovascular complications by catecholamine phenotype. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data on the prevalence of cardiovascular events in 341 consecutive patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma treated from 1995 to 2023. Biochemical catecholamine phenotype was determined based on plasma or urinary catecholamines and metanephrines. Results According to the phenotype, 153 patients had noradrenergic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma and 188 had adrenergic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. In the whole sample, the incidence of serious cardiovascular complications was 28% (95 patients), with no difference between the phenotypes or sexes. The noradrenergic phenotype had significantly more atherosclerotic complications (composite end point of type 1 myocardial infarction and symptomatic peripheral artery disease; odds ratio, 3.58 [95% CI, 1.59-8.83]; P = .003), while the adrenergic phenotype more often had type 2 myocardial infarction and takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy (OR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.09-0.57]; P = .002). These changes remained even after adjustment for conventional risk factors of atherosclerosis. Conclusions We found a 28% incidence of cardiovascular complications in a consecutive group of patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Patients presenting with a noradrenergic phenotype have a higher incidence of atherosclerotic complications, while the adrenergic phenotype is associated with a higher incidence of acute myocardial damage due to takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ondřej Petrák (2026) conducted a cohort in Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (n=341). Noradrenergic phenotype vs. Adrenergic phenotype was evaluated on Atherosclerotic complications (composite end point of type 1 myocardial infarction and symptomatic peripheral artery disease) (OR 3.58, 95% CI 1.59-8.83, p=.003). Patients with a noradrenergic phenotype had a significantly higher incidence of atherosclerotic complications compared to the adrenergic phenotype (OR 3.58; 95% CI 1.59-8.83; P=.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: