Why the study?
Traditional lipid parameters poorly capture coronary heart disease risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus, necessitating evaluation of apolipoprotein and lipoprotein(a) profiles for improved prediction.
Do serum apolipoprotein profiles (ApoB/ApoA1 ratio) and Lipoprotein(a) predict the presence of coronary heart disease better than traditional lipid parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Case-Control (n=140)
Do serum apolipoprotein profiles (ApoB/ApoA1 ratio) and Lipoprotein(a) predict the presence of coronary heart disease better than traditional lipid parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.959 (95% CI 0.921-0.982)
In patients with type 2 diabetes, the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio and Lp(a) levels are strong independent predictors of coronary heart disease, outperforming traditional lipid parameters.
Apo profiles may aid CHD risk assessment in T2DM; extends observational data but leaves open prospective validation.
Traditional lipid parameters poorly capture coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study compared apolipoprotein (ApoA1, ApoB) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] profiles between T2DM patients with and without CHD and evaluated their combined predictive value. This retrospective study included 140 T2DM patients, 70 with angiographically confirmed CHD and 70 age- and sex-matched without CHD (defined by the absence of cardiac symptoms, normal electrocardiogram, and normal echocardiogram). Fasting serum levels of traditional lipids, ApoA1, ApoB, and Lp(a) were measured, and the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio was calculated. Multivariate logistic regression and ROC curve analysis identified independent predictors and assessed predictive performance. Traditional lipid parameters showed no significant differences between groups (all p > 0.05). CHD patients had significantly lower ApoA1 (1.33 vs. 1.56 g/L, p < 0.001) and higher ApoB (1.40 vs. 1.21 g/L, p < 0.001), ApoB/ApoA1 ratio (1.05 vs. 0.78, p < 0.001), and Lp(a) (20.65 vs. 14.10 mg/dL, p = 0.009). Multivariate analysis identified smoking, ApoB/ApoA1 ratio, and Lp(a) as independent predictors. The ApoB/ApoA1 ratio yielded an AUC of 0.912. A combined model achieved an AUC of 0.976, with bootstrap internal validation confirming robustness (optimism-corrected AUC = 0.959, 95% CI: 0.921-0.982). The ApoB/ApoA1 ratio and Lp(a) were independently associated with CHD in T2DM patients. The combined model demonstrated excellent predictive performance, maintained after internal validation, though external validation is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Type 2 diabetes mellitus with coronary heart disease (n=140). Serum ApoB/ApoA1 ratio and Lipoprotein(a) vs. Patients without coronary heart disease was evaluated on Coronary heart disease prediction (AUC 0.959, 95% CI 0.921-0.982).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: