Key result
Higher wearable PPG tail entropy linked to ~0.14 m/s higher PWV per SD.
Why the study?
Consumer-grade wearable PPG devices operate at low sampling rates and are affected by motion artifacts, complicating reliable arterial stiffness measurement.
Does Tail Entropy (TE) from low-rate wearable PPG correlate with reference pulse wave velocity (PWV) for arterial stiffness tracking?
Observational
Does Tail Entropy (TE) from low-rate wearable PPG correlate with reference pulse wave velocity (PWV) for arterial stiffness tracking?
Mean Difference: 0.139 (95% CI 0.038–0.241)
p-value: p=0.0072
Tail Entropy (TE) is a feasible and complementary distributional descriptor for tracking within-person arterial stiffness trends using low-rate wearable PPG under motion artifacts.
TE may aid robust PPG stiffness indexing in wearables; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Consumer-grade wearable photoplethysmography (PPG) commonly operates at low sampling rates and is frequently affected by motion artifacts, making the reliable localization of fine-grained morphological fiducial points difficult. In particular, dicrotic-notch localization, which is used by several arterial-stiffness indices, becomes unstable under sampling quantization, while derivative-based metrics can amplify discretization and measurement noise. We therefore investigated Tail Entropy (TE), an integral-like distributional descriptor originally developed for cuffless blood pressure estimation, as a complementary feature for PWV-related within-person trend analysis. TE characterizes the amplitude distribution of the diastolic runoff and remains computable when a distinct dicrotic notch cannot be reliably identified. In a linear mixed-effects model with subject-specific random intercepts, a one-standard-deviation increase in TE was associated with a 0.139 m/s increase in reference PWV (95% CI: 0.038–0.241 m/s, p = 0.0072 , FDR-adjusted q = 0.0408 ). Crest time and RI also remained significant after FDR correction, indicating that TE did not uniformly outperform conventional indices. The TE coefficient remained directionally stable across the tested temporal-alignment and diastolic-boundary settings. These pilot-scale findings support TE as a complementary distributional descriptor for within-person hemodynamic trend analysis under low-rate wearable sensing, but they do not establish TE as an independent arterial-stiffness marker or a clinical-grade estimator of absolute PWV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Arterial stiffness. Tail Entropy (TE) from wearable photoplethysmography vs. Conventional arterial-stiffness indices was evaluated on Reference Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) (MD 0.139 m/s per 1-SD increase, 95% CI 0.038-0.241, p=0.0072). A one-standard-deviation increase in Tail Entropy from wearable photoplethysmography was associated with a 0.139 m/s increase in reference PWV (95% CI 0.038-0.241; p=0.0072).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: