Key result
Preoperative fibrinogen- and D-dimer-based LGBM model predicts postoperative VTE with ~0.89 AUC.
Why the study?
A risk prediction model for venous thromboembolism after orthopedic surgery was needed to enable early identification of high-risk individuals in clinical settings.
Does a machine learning model based on preoperative variables accurately predict postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery?
Cohort (n=617)
Yes
Does a machine learning model based on preoperative variables accurately predict postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.893 (95% CI 0.820-0.966)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.893% vs 0.865%
A machine learning model based primarily on preoperative fibrinogen and D-dimer levels shows good discriminative ability for predicting postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.
May support preoperative VTE risk stratification via ML in orthopedic patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Objective: A risk prediction model for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after orthopedic surgery was constructed and validated using machine learning algorithms, providing a reference for the early identification of high-risk individuals in clinical settings. Method: Patients who underwent orthopedic surgery were retrospectively collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database as the modeling group. The patients were randomly divided into training and internal test sets in a 7:3 ratio. A total of 156 patients who underwent orthopedic surgery in our hospital from January 2022 to July 2025 were selected for the external validation set. Predictive variables were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Six machine learning models were constructed: logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and naive Bayes (NBM). The model performance was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and G-mean. The interpretability of the optimal model was analyzed using the calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and SHAP methods. Results: The MIMIC-IV database included 461 patients (VTE incidence rate, 15.8%). LASSO regression identified two predictive variables: fibrinogen and D-dimer levels. The AUC of the LGBM model in the internal test set was 0.893 (95% CI: 0.820-0.966), and in the external validation, the AUC of the LGBM model was 0.788. The predictive performance of this model was superior to that of the other five models tested. The calibration curve indicated that the model was well calibrated, and the decision curve suggested a clinical net benefit within the 0.1-0.6 threshold range. SHAP analysis showed that elevated fibrinogen and D-dimer levels were positively correlated with the risk of VTE. Conclusion: The LGBM model constructed based on the MIMIC-IV database has excellent predictive efficacy for VTE after orthopedic surgery and certain external generalization abilities. Fibrinogen and D-dimer levels are key predictive factors. This model can serve as a preliminary reference tool for risk stratification of VTE after orthopedic surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) in orthopedic surgery (n=617). Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) predictive model using fibrinogen and D-dimer vs. Logistic regression (LR) model was evaluated on Prediction of postoperative venous thromboembolism (AUC in the internal test set) (AUC 0.893, 95% CI 0.820-0.966). The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) model, utilizing preoperative fibrinogen and D-dimer levels, demonstrated excellent predictive efficacy for postoperative venous thromboembolism with an internal test AUC of 0.893 and external validation AUC of 0.788.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: