Key result
Female sex is linked to similar 1-year survival as male sex in acute pulmonary embolism.
Why the study?
Prior studies suggested differences in clinical characteristics and risk factors between males and females with pulmonary embolism, but detailed sex-based differences in presentation, management, and outcomes were not fully described.
Does sex influence presentation, management, and survival in adult patients with acute pulmonary embolism managed by a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team?
Cohort (n=1,000)
Does sex influence presentation, management, and survival in adult patients with acute pulmonary embolism managed by a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team?
Despite differences in baseline characteristics, acute pulmonary embolism severity, interventions, and survival outcomes are similar between males and females managed within a standardized Pulmonary Embolism Response Team pathway.
Sex differences in PERT-evaluated PE may guide targeted research; leaves open whether they warrant sex-specific protocols.
Introduction: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular death, with prior studies suggesting differences in clinical characteristics and risk factors between males and females. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all 1,000 adult patients with confirmed PE evaluated by the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) at Corewell Health West from November 2019 to March 2024 to describe sex-based differences in presentation, management, and outcomes. Based on sex, patients were classified by differences in demographic, clinical, biomarker, treatment, and outcome measures, including 30-day and one-year survival. Results: Among 1,000 patients, 480 (48%) were female. Females were older (64 vs. 62.4 years; p = 0.028), had higher body mass index (35.5 vs. 32.2; p < 0.001), and more frequently reported hormone use (21% vs. 5%; p < 0.001). Troponin and Pro-BNP elevations were higher in proportion in females, while males were more likely to smoke (26% vs. 15%; p < 0.001) and present with cough (31% vs. 23%; p = 0.005). No significant sex differences were observed in PE severity, catheter-based interventions, inferior vena cava filter placement, or 30-day (females 8.7%, males 5.8%; p = 0.064) and one-year survival (females 85.4%, males 87.9%; p = 0.217). Conclusion: Despite differences in baseline characteristics and certain clinical features, PE severity, interventions, and outcomes were similar between sexes in this PERT-managed cohort. This highlights sex-specific variations in presentation without differences in management or outcomes within a standardized multidisciplinary pathway such as PERT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obeidat et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute Pulmonary Embolism (n=1,000). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on One-year survival (p=0.217). Among adults with acute pulmonary embolism, female sex was associated with similar one-year survival compared to male sex (85.4% vs 87.9%; P=0.217).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: