Key result
Lower unadjusted survival to discharge for women with acute PE disappears after clinical adjustment.
Why the study?
While gender disparities exist in cardiovascular disease, data regarding the impact of sex in acute pulmonary embolism are limited.
Does female sex impact survival to discharge or management in patients hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolism?
Cohort (n=2,031)
No
Does female sex impact survival to discharge or management in patients hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolism?
Despite differences in clinical presentation and comorbidity profiles, there are no significant sex disparities in the management or adjusted short-term survival of patients hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No sex difference in adjusted survival after acute PE; supports equitable care but leaves open questions on presentation variations.
While the presence of gender disparities in cardiovascular disease have been described, there is a paucity of data regarding the impact of sex in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). We identified all patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital with acute PE between August 1, 2012 through July 1, 2018. We stratified the presenting characteristics, management, and outcomes between women and men. Of the 2031 patients admitted with acute PE, 1081 (53.2%) were women. Women were more likely to present with dyspnea (59.8% vs 52.0%, p < 0.001) and less likely to present with hemoptysis (1.9% vs 4.0%, p = 0.01). Women were older (63.8 ± 17.4 years vs 62.3 ± 15.0 years, p = 0.04), but had lower rates of myocardial infarction, liver disease, smoking history, and prior DVT. PE severity was similar between women and men (massive: 4.9% vs 3.6%; submassive: 43.9% vs 41.8%; p = 0.19), yet women were more likely to present with normal right ventricular size on a surface echocardiogram (63.2% vs 54.8%, p = 0.01). In unadjusted analyses, women were less likely to survive to discharge (92.4% vs 94.7%, p = 0.04), but after adjustment, there was no sex-based survival difference. There were no sex differences in the PE-related diagnostic studies performed, use of advanced therapies, or short-term outcomes, before and after adjustment ( p > 0.05 for all). In this large PE cohort from a tertiary care institution, women had different comorbidity profiles and PE presentations compared with men. Despite these differences, there were no sex disparities in PE management or outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pribish et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute pulmonary embolism (n=2,031). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Survival to discharge (p=0.04). Among patients hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolism, unadjusted survival to discharge was lower in women (92.4% vs 94.7%, p=0.04), but this sex difference disappeared after adjustment (p>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: