Key result
Changes in body composition and baseline body composition were not significantly associated with improvements in peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) among cardiovascular disease patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation.
Why the study?
Improvement in VO2 peak is not observed in all patients following cardiac rehabilitation, and the relationship between VO2 peak non-response and changes in body composition is unclear.
Are baseline body composition or changes in body composition associated with improvements in VO2 peak in patients with cardiovascular disease undergoing cardiac rehabilitation?
Cohort (n=143)
No
Are baseline body composition or changes in body composition associated with improvements in VO2 peak in patients with cardiovascular disease undergoing cardiac rehabilitation?
Absolute Event Rate: -4.1% vs -2.9%
p-value: p=>0.05
Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness following cardiac rehabilitation are not driven by changes in body composition, suggesting that VO2 peak improvements reflect other physiological adaptations.
Body composition changes occur independently of VO2peak gains in cardiac rehab; leaves open distinct mechanisms for fitness response in CVD.
Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 peak) and body composition in patients with cardiovascular disease. However, improvement in VO 2 peak is not observed in all patients following a CR program, and whether VO 2 peak non-responders also demonstrate limited changes in body composition remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between changes in VO 2 peak and body composition in patients undergoing a CR program. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients who completed CR between 2015 and 2022 at Mayo Clinic. The study included 143 patients who completed cardiopulmonary exercise testing and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry pre- and post-CR. Patients were grouped by the change in relative VO 2 peak response to CR (responders= Δ>0 vs non-responders=Δ ≤0 mL/kg/min). Two-way repeated ANOVA was used to compare groups, and regression models were used to examine the associations between baseline body composition and changes in body composition with VO 2 peak change. Results Among the cohort, 26% were classified as non-responders based on relative VO 2 peak measurements. Both groups exhibited a significant improvement in most body composition variables including body fat mass, body fat percentage, body lean percentage, and fat mass index (all p<0.001), with no differences in the percentage of change in body composition variables between groups (p>0.05). Regression models demonstrated that neither baseline body composition nor changes in body composition were significantly associated with changes in VO 2 peak. Conclusion Our data suggest that baseline and change in body composition were not significantly associated with changes in VO 2 peak in patients undergoing the CR program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharif et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=143). VO2peak response to cardiac rehabilitation (Responders, ΔVO2peak > 0 mL/kg/min) vs. VO2peak non-responders (ΔVO2peak ≤ 0 mL/kg/min) was evaluated on Percentage change in body fat percentage (% Δ BF%) between pre- and post-cardiac rehabilitation (p=>0.05). Changes in body composition and baseline body composition were not significantly associated with improvements in peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) among cardiovascular disease patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: