Key result
REDUCE-IT criteria identify ~10% of post-ACS rehabilitation patients as eligible for icosapent ethyl versus <1% by AIFA.
Why the study?
Many patients with established cardiovascular disease maintain elevated triglyceride levels despite optimal lipid-lowering therapy, and eligibility for icosapent ethyl treatment based on clinical and regulatory criteria is unclear.
Cohort (n=1,129)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Over 10% of real-world acute and chronic coronary syndrome patients in cardiac rehabilitation are eligible for icosapent ethyl based on REDUCE-IT criteria, but strict local administrative criteria restrict access to less than 1%.
Introduction Despite optimal lipid–lowering therapy, many patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) maintain elevated triglyceride (TG) levels, contributing to residual risk. Icosapent ethyl (IPE) has shown clinical benefit in patients with moderate hypertriglyceridemia. This study aimed to evaluate eligibility for IPE treatment based on REDUCE–IT and Italian Drugs Administration (AIFA) eligibility criteria. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 1129 patients referred to a cardiac rehabilitation program for a recent acute coronary syndromes or with a chronic coronary syndromes between 2012 and 2025. Fasting TG and LDL were assessed at admission and discharge. We identified patients eligible for IPE treatment based on REDUCE–IT (TG 135–499 mg/dL, LDL 40–100 mg/dL, statin therapy) and AIFA eligibility criteria (TG ≥200 mg/dL, LDL ‹70 mg/dL, BMI ≥27 kg/m², statin + ezetimibe therapies, age 18–80). Results Median TG values significantly decreased from 117 (IQR 86–159) mg/dL at admission to 99 (79–132) mg/dL at discharge (p‹0.001). LDL also decreased from 106.7 ± 40.1 to 62.8 ± 24.8 mg/dL (p‹0.001). Based on REDUCE–IT criteria, 117 patients (10.4%) were eligible for IPE while only 6 patients (0.53%) met all AIFA eligibility criteria. Conclusions In a large real–world cohort of acute and chronic coronary syndrome undergoing cardiac rehabilitation, over 10% of patients were theoretically eligible for IPE based on clinical trial criteria. However, less than 1% met current AIFA eligibility conditions due to added restrictions, highlighting a significant barrier to implementation in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brucato et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute or chronic coronary syndromes (n=1,129). Icosapent ethyl eligibility assessment (REDUCE-IT vs AIFA criteria) was evaluated on Eligibility for icosapent ethyl treatment based on REDUCE-IT and AIFA criteria. In patients with coronary syndromes undergoing cardiac rehabilitation, 10.4% were eligible for icosapent ethyl based on REDUCE-IT criteria, whereas only 0.53% met AIFA criteria.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: