Key result
Continuing low-dose aspirin during MIS-ATP lumbar fusion does not increase estimated blood loss.
Why the study?
Perioperative aspirin management in spine surgery is controversial due to bleeding risk versus thrombotic complications, with limited evidence specific to minimally invasive lumbar fusion techniques.
Does perioperative continuation of low-dose aspirin increase operative time, estimated blood loss, or length of stay in adult patients undergoing minimally invasive anterior-to-psoas lumbar fusion?
Cohort (n=455)
No
Does perioperative continuation of low-dose aspirin increase operative time, estimated blood loss, or length of stay in adult patients undergoing minimally invasive anterior-to-psoas lumbar fusion?
Absolute Event Rate: 244.4% vs 278.4%
p-value: p=0.62
Perioperative continuation of low-dose aspirin during minimally invasive anterior-to-psoas lumbar fusion does not significantly increase blood loss, transfusion rates, or length of stay compared to preoperative discontinuation.
May support continuing aspirin without added EBL or stay; leaves open randomized confirmation in anterior-to-psoas fusion.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of perioperative aspirin continuation on surgical and postoperative outcomes following minimally invasive anterior-to-psoas (MIS-ATP) lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Perioperative aspirin management in spine surgery remains controversial, with concerns centered on bleeding risk versus thrombotic complications associated with discontinuation. Evidence specific to minimally invasive lumbar fusion techniques, particularly the MIS-ATP approach, is limited. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent MIS-ATP lumbar fusion with supplemental posterior percutaneous fixation at a single academic medical center (2014-2020) were included. Patients who continued low-dose aspirin through the perioperative period were compared with those who discontinued aspirin preoperatively. Propensity score matching (1:1 nearest-neighbor) incorporated age, sex, BMI, race/ethnicity, fusion levels, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, CAD, COPD, CKD), smoking, alcohol use, and preoperative laboratory values. Primary outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative day-1 hemoglobin, and length of stay. A subanalysis compared aspirin continuers with patients who held aspirin ≥7 days preoperatively. RESULTS: Of 455 eligible patients, 134 (29.5%) continued aspirin and 321 (70.5%) discontinued. Propensity matching yielded 86 well-balanced pairs (n=172). Operative time (224.7±97.9 vs. 228.6±90.1 min; P=0.79), EBL (244.4±456.0 vs. 278.4±418.7 mL; P=0.62), postoperative day-1 hemoglobin (10.88±1.49 vs. 11.08±1.76 g/dL; P=0.41), and length of stay (4.83±3.72 vs. 4.20±2.49 days; P=0.22) did not differ significantly. Transfusion rates (18.6% vs. 15.1%; P=0.54) and retroperitoneal hematoma (1.2% vs. 1.2%; P=1.00) were comparable. The ≥7-day-hold subanalysis (15 matched pairs) showed no outcome advantage over continuation. CONCLUSION: Perioperative continuation of low-dose aspirin in appropriately selected patients undergoing MIS-ATP lumbar fusion was not associated with increased surgical morbidity or postoperative complications, supporting an individualized, approach-specific approach to perioperative antiplatelet management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Minimally invasive anterior-to-psoas (MIS-ATP) lumbar fusion (n=455). Perioperative low-dose aspirin continuation vs. Preoperative aspirin discontinuation was evaluated on Estimated blood loss (mL) (p=0.62). Perioperative continuation of low-dose aspirin in MIS-ATP lumbar fusion did not significantly increase estimated blood loss (244.4 vs 278.4 mL; P=0.62) compared to preoperative discontinuation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: