Key result
Telmisartan did not significantly reduce the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus compared with losartan, valsartan, or candesartan (10.61% vs 11.02%; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.08).
Why the study?
Evidence remains limited on whether telmisartan with partial PPAR-γ activity lowers new-onset diabetes mellitus risk compared with non-PPAR-γ-active ARBs.
Does telmisartan reduce the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus in adults compared with losartan, valsartan, or candesartan?
Cohort (n=29,368)
Yes
Does telmisartan reduce the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus in adults compared with losartan, valsartan, or candesartan?
In a large real-world cohort, telmisartan did not significantly reduce the risk of new-onset diabetes compared with other non-PPAR-γ-active ARBs.
Evidence remains limited on whether telmisartan with partial peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ) activity lowers new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) risk compared with non-PPAR-γ-active angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). We therefore evaluated the NODM risk of telmisartan compared with losartan, valsartan, and candesartan using real-world clinical data. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, treatment-control cohort study using clinical data from 17 institutions between 2005 and 2023, covering 19 283 922 patients converted to a common data model. Adults newly prescribed telmisartan or other ARBs (losartan, valsartan, or candesartan) and taking the medication for ≥6 months were included, while patients with pre-existing diabetes were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. The primary outcome was incident NODM, defined by a diagnosis of diabetes (ICD-10), initiation of glucose-lowering medications, or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%. A total of 6 868 patients of new-users of telmisartan and 22 500 patients of other ARBs were included. In the overall population, telmisartan was associated with lower NODM risk (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.94). After 1:2 PSM, there was no significant difference in the risk of NODM between telmisartan and other ARBs (10.61% [39.50/1 000 person-years] vs. 11.02% [40.42/1 000 person-years]; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.08). Secondary analyses were also not significantly different. Overall, this study did not detect sufficient evidence that telmisartan reduces NODM risk compared with losartan, valsartan, or candesartan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients prescribed angiotensin II receptor blockers (n=29,368). Telmisartan vs. Losartan, valsartan, or candesartan was evaluated on Incident new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.08). Telmisartan did not significantly reduce the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus compared with losartan, valsartan, or candesartan (10.61% vs 11.02%; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.08).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: