Key result
Telmisartan matches valsartan in reducing proteinuria by ~33% among hypertensive T2D patients with overt nephropathy.
Why the study?
Renin-angiotensin system blockade reduces proteinuria and prevents nephropathy progression in T2D, but the comparative antiproteinuric effects of telmisartan versus valsartan and their impact on inflammatory parameters remain unclear.
Does telmisartan reduce proteinuria compared to valsartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and overt nephropathy?
RCT (n=885)
Double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does telmisartan reduce proteinuria compared to valsartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and overt nephropathy?
Telmisartan and valsartan provide similar reductions in proteinuria and renoprotection in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy, with effects primarily driven by blood pressure control.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Either ARB may be selected for renoprotection in this population; confirms comparable efficacy of telmisartan and valsartan.
BACKGROUND: Renin-angiotensin system blockade reduces proteinuria and prevents nephropathy progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Experimental evidence demonstrates that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) possess anti-inflammatory potential, which might contribute to reducing proteinuria and providing renoprotection. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, prospective, parallel-group non-inferiority study of 885 hypertensive [systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) >130/80 mmHg] patients with T2D, proteinuria (> or =900 mg/24 h) and serum creatinine (< or =3.0 mg/dl) who were randomized to once-daily telmisartan 80 mg or valsartan 160 mg; additional antihypertensive therapy was permitted. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the 24-h proteinuria after 12 months. Secondary endpoints included changes in 24-h albuminuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and inflammatory parameters asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) and urinary 8-iso-prostaglandin F(2alpha) (8-iso-PGF(2alpha)). RESULTS: Telmisartan and valsartan produced comparable reductions in 24-h urinary protein excretion rates: geometric mean reduction (95% confidence interval) [telmisartan, 33% (27-39%); valsartan, 33% (27-38%)]. No significant differences between treatments were seen in changes from baseline in 24-h urinary albumin excretion rate and eGFR at 12 months. With both treatments, greater renoprotection was seen among patients with better blood pressure control. No significant changes in ADMA or CRP were noted in either group after 12 months, but urinary 8-iso-PGF(2alpha) levels decreased by 14% with telmisartan and by 7% with valsartan (P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T2D, hypertension and overt nephropathy, the renoprotection afforded by telmisartan and valsartan appears similar, and the study was unable to show any effect beyond that due to blood pressure control. At doses used to treat hypertension, there is no evidence of inflammatory parameters being modified by ARBs in patients with more advanced kidney disease due to T2D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galle et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and overt nephropathy (n=885). telmisartan vs. valsartan 160 mg once-daily was evaluated on change from baseline in the 24-h proteinuria after 12 months. Telmisartan and valsartan produced comparable 33% reductions in 24-h urinary protein excretion rates at 12 months in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: