Key result
Telmisartan and valsartan similarly reduced blood pressure with no significant differences in cardiovascular, metabolic, or inflammatory parameters after 12 weeks in patients with uncomplicated hypertension.
Why the study?
Does telmisartan improve cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory parameters compared to valsartan in patients with uncomplicated hypertension?
RCT (n=60)
Open-label
Randomized
No
Does telmisartan improve cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory parameters compared to valsartan in patients with uncomplicated hypertension?
Mean Difference: 36 (95% CI -30.2–102.2)
Absolute Event Rate: -41.8% vs -77.8%
p-value: p=0.281
A 12-week treatment with telmisartan or valsartan similarly reduced blood pressure and showed no significant differences in cardiovascular, metabolic, or inflammatory parameter changes in patients with uncomplicated hypertension.
May support differential ARB selection in hypertension; leaves open need for larger trials to confirm metabolic benefits.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) have beneficial effects on cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory parameters in addition to controlling blood pressure (BP). However, few comparative clinical studies have been conducted with different ARBs. We compared these effects in patients with uncomplicated hypertension who were receiving telmisartan or valsartan. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were patients with essential hypertension (48.4±9.6 years) who were randomly assigned to take either telmisartan (80 mg/day, n=30) or valsartan (160 mg/day, n=30) for 12 weeks. Their anthropometric, laboratory, vascular, and echocardiographic data were measured at baseline and at the end of the study. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups, except for the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV; telmisartan group vs. valsartan group; 841.2±131.0 vs. 761.1±104.4 cm/s, p<0.05). After 12 weeks, BP had fallen to a similar extent with mean reductions in the systolic and diastolic BP of 20.7±18.1 and 16.3±13.0 mm Hg (p<0.001, respectively) for the telmisartan and 22.5±17.0 and 16.8±9.3 mm Hg (p<0.001, respectively) for the valsartan group. Although the cfPWV and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) fell significantly only with the administration of telmisartan, they were not significantly different when baseline cfPWV was considered. The differences in the cfPWV and LVMI changes from baseline between the two groups were also not significant after adjusting for baseline cfPWV. No significant changes in other vascular, metabolic, or inflammatory parameters were observed with either treatment. CONCLUSION: The effects of a 12-week treatment with the two ARBs, telmisartan and valsartan, on cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory parameters were not different in patients with uncomplicated hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in Essential hypertension (n=60). Telmisartan vs. Valsartan (160 mg/day) was evaluated on Adjusted change in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) from baseline (MD 36.0, 95% CI -30.2, 102.2, p=0.281). Telmisartan and valsartan similarly reduced blood pressure with no significant differences in cardiovascular, metabolic, or inflammatory parameters after 12 weeks in patients with uncomplicated hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: