Key result
Prolonged lead D2 P-wave peak time is strongly linked to stroke in paroxysmal AF.
Why the study?
The association between P-wave peak time and cardiogenic cerebral infarction in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was unclear.
Case-Control (n=140)
Effect estimate: AUC 0.910
OBJECTIVE This research investigates whether P-wave peak time (PWPT), a new electrocardiographic index, is associated with cardiogenic cerebral infarction (CCI) in individuals with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). METHODS Seventy patients with PAF complicated by CCI were enrolled in the PAF-CCI group, and another 70 patients with PAF without cerebral infarction (CI) were matched as the PAF-non-CI group. Comprehensive demographic, electrocardiogram data, and laboratory were collected and measured from two groups of subjects and compared between the groups. RESULTS PWPT in lead V1 and D2 (PWPT-V1 and PWPT-D2), P-wave dispersion (PWd), P-wave duration (PWdur), Maximum PWdur (Pmax), Minimum PWdur (Pmin), QT interval (QT), and PR interval (PR) in the PAF-CCI group were notably longer, while heart rate (HR) was notably slower than those in the PAF-non-CI group. In multivariate analysis, PWPT-D2 remained an independent risk factor for PAF-CCI, along with age, PWd, PWPT-V1 and QT. PWPT-D2 exhibited the highest discriminatory power among these variables (AUC = 0.910). When the optimal cutoff was set at >58.25 ms, the sensitivity was 95.7% and the specificity was 90.0%. CONCLUSION PWPT-D2 is independently associated with CCI in PAF patients and holds predictive value for CCI development in PAF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (n=140). P-wave peak time (PWPT) prolongation vs. PAF without cerebral infarction was evaluated on Cardiogenic cerebral infarction (AUC 0.910). Prolonged P-wave peak time in lead D2 (>58.25 ms) was independently associated with cardiogenic cerebral infarction in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients (AUC 0.910; 95.7% sensitivity).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: