Key result
PICCOLETO IV-EPIC38 tests SAPT versus DAPT for net clinical benefit after DCB-only PCI.
Why the study?
Elderly or high bleeding risk patients undergoing PCI with drug-coated balloons have increased ischemic and bleeding complications, but no trial has prospectively evaluated safety and efficacy of single antiplatelet therapy after DCB-only PCI.
Does single antiplatelet therapy reduce net adverse clinical events in elderly or high bleeding risk patients undergoing DCB-only PCI compared to dual antiplatelet therapy?
RCT (n=576)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does single antiplatelet therapy reduce net adverse clinical events in elderly or high bleeding risk patients undergoing DCB-only PCI compared to dual antiplatelet therapy?
The PICCOLETO IV-EPIC38 study protocol outlines the first prospective evaluation of single vs. dual antiplatelet therapy following drug-coated balloon-only PCI in elderly or high bleeding risk patients.
RATIONALE Elderly patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently present a high bleeding risk (HBR). In this category of patients, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is also associated with a higher risk of periprocedural and long-term ischemic and bleeding complications. PCI with drug-coated balloons (DCB) with short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a valid alternative to stenting in this group of elderly or HBR patients. To date, no dedicated trial has prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of a PCI with solo-DCB followed by single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). OBJECTIVES The study aims to evaluate the incidence of ischemic and bleeding adverse events following SAPT after only-DCB PCI in elderly patients or those with high bleeding risk, either with chronic or acute coronary syndromes. DESIGN PICCOLETO IV-EPIC38 study (clinicaltrial.gov: NCT06535568) is a prospective, international, multicenter, investigator-driven, open-label, randomized (1:1), superiority clinical trial. The study will enroll elderly patients aged 75 years or older (≥75 years) or HBR patients, as defined by the Academic Research Consortium criteria, who are undergoing successful DCB-only PCI for native coronary artery disease in vessels with a diameter between 2.0 and 4.0 mm. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between two treatment groups: the experimental arm receiving SAPT and the comparative arm receiving DAPT. Patients in the experimental arm will receive either aspirin or clopidogrel. In the comparative arm, patients will receive standard care. The primary endpoint of this study is the incidence of Net Adverse Clinical Events (NACE), defined as the composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including total mortality, target vessel revascularization, and spontaneous myocardial infarction, and clinically relevant bleeding events (BARC 2, 3, or 5), assessed over 12 months. A superiority hypothesis will be tested. A total of 576 patients will be enrolled in the study, with primary analysis conducted on an intention-to-treat basis and secondary analysis performed on an as-treated basis. Randomization will take place after successful intervention. SUMMARY The PICCOLETO IV-EPIC38 study is a randomized trial assessing the safety and efficacy of SAPT post-PCI with DCB treatment, which could significantly impact treatment for elderly or HBR patients with CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wańha et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Obstructive coronary artery disease (n=576). Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) vs. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was evaluated on Net Adverse Clinical Events (NACE), composite of total mortality, target vessel revascularization, spontaneous myocardial infarction, and clinically relevant bleeding events (BARC 2, 3, or 5). The PICCOLETO IV-EPIC38 trial will randomize 576 elderly or high bleeding risk patients to SAPT versus DAPT after DCB-only PCI to evaluate superiority for net adverse clinical events at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: