Why the study?
Older patients undergoing PCI have high ischemic and bleeding risks, making the optimal duration of DAPT after PCI unclear.
Does very short duration DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy improve safety and efficacy compared to standard DAPT in older patients undergoing PCI?
Does very short duration DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy improve safety and efficacy compared to standard DAPT in older patients undergoing PCI?
Very short duration DAPT (≤ 3 months) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy appears to be a valid option with similar safety and efficacy to standard DAPT in older patients undergoing PCI.
Supports short DAPT in older PCI patients; extends prior evidence to this high-risk group.
Background older patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) represent a growing population sharing both a high ischemic and bleeding risk. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces the incidence of thrombotic events but exposes patients to an increased risk of bleeding and subsequent mortality. Its optimal duration after PCI remains unclear. Objective to assess the impact of short-duration DAPT on both bleeding and ischemic events in the specific population of older patients undergoing PCI. Methods we performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of standard versus very short duration (≤ 3 months, followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy) DAPT after PCI with a drug-eluting stent in older patients. Results four studies, representing 8,961 older patients, were finally included. Compared with standard duration, short-duration DAPT was associated with similar rates of major bleeding (relative risks, RR 0.70 [0.47; 1.05]) and the composite efficacy endpoint (RR 0.85 [0.63; 1.14]). There was a high level of heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 68%) regarding major bleeding. Conclusion our meta-analysis suggests that short DAPT may be a valid option in older patients after PCI but it also highlights the need for specific studies in such patients on optimal duration of antiplatelet therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roule et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: