Key result
U-shaped catheter strategy for PESA cuts 12-month resting LVOT gradient by ~17 mmHg vs conventional approach.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Percutaneous endomyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation (PESA) is a promising therapy for HOCM, but the comparative efficacy and safety of a novel U-shaped catheter strategy versus the conventional approach were unknown.
Does a U-shaped catheter strategy improve procedural efficiency and reduce LVOT obstruction compared to a conventional retrograde approach in patients with HOCM undergoing percutaneous endomyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation?
Cohort (n=27)
No
Does a U-shaped catheter strategy improve procedural efficiency and reduce LVOT obstruction compared to a conventional retrograde approach in patients with HOCM undergoing percutaneous endomyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 32% vs 48.5%
p-value: p=0.03
A U-shaped catheter strategy for percutaneous endocardial septal radiofrequency ablation safely improves procedural efficiency and LVOT gradient reduction in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy compared to the conventional approach.
BACKGROUND Percutaneous endomyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation (PESA) has emerged as a promising septal reduction therapy for patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of a novel U-shaped catheter strategy with the conventional retrograde catheter approach during PESA in patients with HOCM. METHODS This single-center retrospective study included 27 patients with HOCM undergoing PESA: 15 treated with the U-shaped catheter strategy (U group) and 12 matched controls treated with the conventional catheter strategy (C group). Procedures were guided by three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping and intracardiac echocardiography, with 12-month follow-up. RESULTS Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in symptoms, NYHA functional class, and echocardiographic parameters at 12-month follow-up. Compared with the C group, the U group achieved a significantly higher catheter-tissue contact force (20.39 ± 3.50 g vs. 17.17 ± 2.13 g, p < 0.01) and a shorter total radiofrequency delivery time (1217.17 ± 612.38 s vs. 1537.94 ± 302.88 s, p = 0.01). The resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient at 12 months was significantly lower in the U group than in C group (32 [29-45] mmHg vs. 48.5 [43.34-58.75] mmHg, p = 0.03). No major complications occurred in either group. Transient atrioventricular (AV) block and left bundle branch block (LBBB) were observed but required no further intervention. CONCLUSIONS The U-shaped catheter strategy for PESA was associated with improved procedural efficiency and greater reduction in LVOT obstruction compared with the conventional catheter approach, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) (n=27). U-shaped catheter strategy vs. Conventional retrograde catheter approach was evaluated on Resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient at 12 months (p=0.03). The U-shaped catheter strategy for PESA significantly lowered resting LVOT gradient at 12 months compared to the conventional approach (32 vs 48.5 mmHg, P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: