Key result
Secondary subaortic stenosis was not independently associated with increased reoperation risk compared to primary subaortic stenosis, with reintervention occurring in 28.4% vs 20.3% (p=0.325).
Why the study?
Recurrence of subaortic stenosis after surgical correction remains common, and differences in presentation, surgical strategy, and long-term outcomes between primary and secondary lesions are not well characterized.
Does secondary subaortic stenosis carry a higher risk of reoperation compared to primary subaortic stenosis in children undergoing discrete subaortic membrane resection?
Cohort (n=153)
No
Does secondary subaortic stenosis carry a higher risk of reoperation compared to primary subaortic stenosis in children undergoing discrete subaortic membrane resection?
Absolute Event Rate: 28.4% vs 20.3%
p-value: p=0.325
Surgical resection of subaortic stenosis yields comparable long-term freedom from reoperation for both primary and secondary lesions, though younger age and prematurity independently increase the risk of recurrence.
Subaortic stenosis is surgically correctable, yet recurrence remains common. This study compares presentation, surgical strategy, and long-term outcomes in children with primary and secondary subaortic stenosis. We reviewed all patients undergoing discreate subaortic membrane resection (January 2007-August 2024). Demographics, echocardiographic findings, surgical details, including resection site and concomitant myomectomy, and outcomes were compared. Membrane involvement of adjacent valves was recorded. Freedom from reoperation was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression. We reviewed 153 patients who underwent subaortic membrane resection at a single institution. Seventy-nine had primary subaortic stenosis and 74 had secondary disease after prior cardiac surgery. The median follow-up was 4.43 years for primary and 3.92 years for secondary subaortic stenosis. Two deaths occurred, both in the secondary group. Genetic syndromes were more common in secondary group (p < 0.001), and abnormal aortic valve morphology was more frequent (p < 0.001). Concomitant myectomy was performed more often in secondary cases (p = 0.003). Reintervention occurred in 28.4% of secondary vs. 20.3% of primary group (p = 0.325). On Cox regression, secondary subaortic stenosis was not independently associated with reoperation, whereas younger age at surgery and prematurity were associated with increased reoperation risk. Surgical resection yields good long-term outcomes for both primary and secondary subaortic stenosis. Secondary lesions more often require concomitant myectomy and may carry a higher recurrence risk, warranting vigilant follow-up and counselling recurrence risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eren et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Subaortic stenosis (n=153). Secondary subaortic stenosis vs. Primary subaortic stenosis was evaluated on Reintervention (p=0.325). Secondary subaortic stenosis was not independently associated with increased reoperation risk compared to primary subaortic stenosis, with reintervention occurring in 28.4% vs 20.3% (p=0.325).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: