Key result
Adding left atrial appendage occlusion to TAVR in patients with atrial fibrillation was not associated with a significant reduction in stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.40-1.74).
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Does the addition of left atrial appendage occlusion to TAVR reduce stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to TAVR plus medical therapy?
Meta-Analysis (n=652)
Does the addition of left atrial appendage occlusion to TAVR reduce stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to TAVR plus medical therapy?
Odds Ratio: 0.83 (95% CI 0.4–1.74)
The addition of LAAO to TAVR in patients with atrial fibrillation yields similar thromboembolic, bleeding, and mortality outcomes compared to medical therapy alone, suggesting LAAO should be reserved for carefully selected patients where long-term anticoagulation is undesirable.
BACKGROUND Stroke prevention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with atrial fibrillation remains clinically challenging because thromboembolic risk must be balanced against substantial bleeding vulnerability. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has been proposed as a nonpharmacologic alternative to long-term anticoagulation in selected patients, but its comparative role in the TAVR population remains insufficiently defined. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies evaluating TAVR plus LAAO versus TAVR plus medical therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. Randomized trials and observational comparative cohorts were eligible. The primary outcome was stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Random-effects odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. RESULTS Four studies comprising 652 patients were included, of whom 289 underwent TAVR plus LAAO and 363 received TAVR plus medical therapy. The evidence base included two randomized trials and two observational studies, with LAAO performed either concomitantly with TAVR or in a staged manner shortly thereafter. TAVR plus LAAO was not associated with a significant reduction in stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism compared with medical therapy (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.40-1.74). There were also no significant differences in major bleeding (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.68-1.77) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.62-1.40). CONCLUSIONS In the currently available comparative evidence, adding LAAO to TAVR was associated with similar thromboembolic, bleeding, and mortality outcomes compared with medical therapy. These findings do not support routine LAAO for all patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing TAVR, but they leave room for selective use in carefully chosen patients in whom long-term anticoagulation is undesirable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abomohsen et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (n=652). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) plus left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) vs. TAVR plus medical therapy was evaluated on Stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.40-1.74). Adding left atrial appendage occlusion to TAVR in patients with atrial fibrillation was not associated with a significant reduction in stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.40-1.74).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: