Key result
FOSL2 or NLRP12 knockdown improves post-MI survival and limits heart failure progression in mice.
Why the study?
The mechanisms by which NLRP12 regulates PANoptosis during postinfarction heart failure were not fully understood.
The FOSL2/NLRP12 axis promotes PANoptosis in cardiomyocytes, highlighting a novel mechanistic pathway and potential therapeutic target for mitigating heart failure following myocardial infarction.
NLRP12 can induce PANoptosis, a novel form of inflammatory cell death. The research aimed to investigate the mechanisms of NLRP12 in regulating PANoptosis during postinfarction heart failure (HF). C57BL/6J mice were treated with AAV-shNLRP12 before acute myocardial infarction (AMI) modeling using coronary artery ligation, and mouse cardiomyocytes were treated with lentiviruses before hypoxia. NLRP12 and FOSL2 were upregulated in myocardial tissues of AMI-induced mice and hypoxia-exposed mouse cardiomyocytes. FOSL2 activated NLRP12 in mouse cardiomyocytes by binding to its promoter. Knockdown of FOSL2 or NLRP12 improved survival and inhibited HF after AMI, including recovery of cardiac function, reduction of fibrotic area of myocardial tissues, decrease of myocardial injury, and inhibition of PANoptosis in mice. Combined overexpression of NLRP12 impaired the inhibitory effect of the knockdown of FOSL2 on HF after AMI. Our findings demonstrate that FOSL2 promotes cardiomyocyte PANoptosis by inducing the transcription of NLRP12, thereby triggering HF after AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2026) studied Heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Knockdown of FOSL2 or NLRP12 was evaluated on Survival and heart failure progression (recovery of cardiac function, reduction of fibrotic area, decrease of myocardial injury, and inhibition of PANoptosis). Knockdown of FOSL2 or NLRP12 improved survival and inhibited heart failure progression after acute myocardial infarction in mice by suppressing cardiomyocyte PANoptosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: