Key result
TAILOR-HCM trial tests transapical beating-heart septal myectomy noninferiority against conventional surgical myectomy in obstructive HCM.
Why the study?
Conventional septal myectomy for drug-refractory obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is technically complex and confined to specialized centers, and whether transapical beating-heart septal myectomy can achieve similar outcomes is unknown due to lack of randomized controlled trials.
Does transapical beating-heart septal myectomy relieve LVOT obstruction non-inferiorly compared to conventional surgical myectomy in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
RCT (n=216)
Assessor-blinded
1:1
Yes
Does transapical beating-heart septal myectomy relieve LVOT obstruction non-inferiorly compared to conventional surgical myectomy in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
The TAILOR-HCM trial is the first multicenter RCT designed to compare the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive transapical beating-heart septal myectomy versus conventional surgical myectomy in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: Septal myectomy is the gold standard treatment for drug-refractory obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). However, conventional septal myectomy (CSM) has been largely confined to specialized centers owing to its technical complexity. Transapical beating-heart septal myectomy (TA-BSM) can simplify CSM, enabling minimally invasive tailored septal resections in the beating heart under real-time echocardiographic guidance. Despite single-institution experience showed favorable efficacy and safety, whether TA-BSM can achieve similar clinical outcomes as CSM remains unknown since randomized controlled trial comparing the 2 approaches was unavailable. METHODS: The TAILOR-HCM trial (Transapical Beating-Heart Septal Myectomy vs Conventional Surgical Myectomy in Patients with Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy) is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, noninferiority trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel device-based TA-BSM procedure conducted at 11 experienced CSM centers in China. In total, 216 symptomatic patients with oHCM who meet guideline-directed indications for septal myectomy will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to TA-BSM or CSM. The primary endpoint is relief of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction at 12 months, defined as a resting LVOT gradient <30 mm Hg and a standardized Valsalva maneuver-provoked LVOT gradient <50 mm Hg. Secondary endpoints include cardiac hemodynamic and structural parameters, procedure-related outcomes, quality of life, and laboratory examinations. The key safety outcome is all-cause mortality within 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: TAILOR-HCM is the first multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating both TA-BSM and CSM in oHCM. Through comparative evidence against CSM, this study will inform future clinical decision-making. If noninferior hemodynamic efficacy with favorable safety is confirmed, TA-BSM may represent an alternative surgical approach that expands therapeutic options and improves access to definitive septal reduction therapy for patients with oHCM. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn. Unique Identifier: ChiCTR2400087414.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=216). Transapical beating-heart septal myectomy (TA-BSM) vs. Conventional surgical myectomy (CSM) was evaluated on Relief of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction at 12 months (resting LVOT gradient <30 mm Hg and Valsalva-provoked gradient <50 mm Hg). The TAILOR-HCM trial will randomize 216 patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to evaluate if transapical beating-heart septal myectomy is noninferior to conventional surgical myectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: