Key result
Dual-bath bipolar radiofrequency ablation creates ~0.9 mm deeper endocardial lesions than single-bath setups.
Why the study?
Differences in lesion size during bipolar radiofrequency ablation may depend on experimental preparation, but these differences have not been systematically compared.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bipolar dual-bath preparations yield deeper endocardial lesions ex vivo; extends experimental modeling of clinical bipolar setups but leaves translation uncertain.
BACKGROUND: During bipolar (BIP) radiofrequency (RF) ablation using two catheters in humans, each catheter is placed in separate cardiac chambers or spaces. We developed a contact force-controlled experimental preparation, and compared measurements made with two catheters placed in a single bath (SB), versus each catheter placed in separate baths, in order to assess the preparation-dependent differences in the results of BIP-RF ablation. METHODS: In the SB experiments, a porcine heart was placed in the center of the bath, while in the dual-bath (DB) experiments, it was placed between two half baths communicating through windows. RESULTS: The initial impedance was greatest (110.5 ± 7.2 Ω) with the BIP-DB, followed by the BIP-SB (92.0 ± 5.6 Ω) and the unipolar (UNIP) DB (84.9 ± 4.7 Ω) configurations. During 50-W ablation for 60 seconds at a 20-g contact force, the root mean square voltage was 75.7 ± 2.5 V in the BIP-DB, 68.0 ± 2.1 V in the BIP-SB, and 66.8 ± 2.0 V in the UNIP-DB. The mean surface lesion diameters were similar among the three configurations. However, the endocardial lesion depth was 5.60 ± 0.56 mm with the BIP-DB, 4.71 ± 0.64 mm with the BIP-SB, and 4.24 ± 0.58 mm with the UNIP-DB configuration. On average, the endocardial lesions were significantly deeper than the epicardial ones. CONCLUSIONS: BIP ablation created much deeper lesions as compared to UNIP ablation. Lesion depth could be different depending on experimental preparation, and contact force-controlled DB preparation may be a much more appropriate model for studying the effects of BIP ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chinushi et al. (2016) studied Ex vivo porcine myocardium (experimental ablation model) (n=7). Bipolar dual-bath (BIP-DB) radiofrequency ablation vs. Bipolar single-bath (BIP-SB) and unipolar dual-bath (UNIP-DB) preparations was evaluated on Endocardial lesion depth. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation in a dual-bath preparation created deeper endocardial lesions (5.60 mm) compared to single-bath (4.71 mm) and unipolar dual-bath (4.24 mm) preparations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: