Key result
Simultaneous biparietal bidirectional bipolar RF ablation achieves ~90% transmural lesions vs uniparietal and unipolar ablation.
Why the study?
To evaluate lesion size and depth of radiofrequency ablation using a simultaneous biparietal bidirectional bipolar approach compared to simultaneous and staged unipolar and uniparietal bipolar setups.
Does simultaneous biparietal bidirectional bipolar RF ablation improve transmurality compared to uniparietal bipolar and unipolar ablation in porcine left atrial tissue?
Does simultaneous biparietal bidirectional bipolar RF ablation improve transmurality compared to uniparietal bipolar and unipolar ablation in porcine left atrial tissue?
Absolute Event Rate: 90% vs 0%
Biparietal bidirectional bipolar RF ablation achieves significantly higher transmurality in porcine left atrial tissue compared to uniparietal approaches, despite creating smaller overall lesions.
Hypothesis-generating for biparietal bidirectional bipolar RF ablation; human studies required before clinical consideration.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the lesion size and depth of radiofrequency (RF) ablation in a simultaneous biparietal bidirectional bipolar (SBB) approach, compared to a simultaneous and staged unipolar and uniparietal bipolar setup [simultaneous uniparietal bipolar (SiUB) and staged uniparietal bipolar (StUB), respectively]. METHODS: Fresh left atrial porcine tissue was mounted into the ABLA-BOX simulator. Different ablation approaches were tested: (i) SBB: a concept consisting of SBB endo-epicardial ablation, (ii) SiUB: simultaneous epicardial uniparietal bipolar and endocardial unipolar ablation and (iii) StUB: staged epicardial uniparietal bipolar and endocardial unipolar ablation. In the StUB setup, a 1-h interval between the epi-endo ablation was respected. RESULTS: Transmural lesions were present in 90% of the bipolar biparietal ablations, yet no full transmurality was observed in the simultaneous nor in the staged unipolar with uniparietal bipolar ablation group. In SBB, the area and volume of the ablation lesions were smaller (523.33 mm2/mm and 52.33 mm3/mm, respectively) than in SiUB (588.17 mm2/mm and 58.81 mm3/mm, respectively) and StUB (583.76 mm2/mm and 58.37 mm3/mm, P = 0.044). Also, in SBB, the overall, epicardial and endocardial maximum diameters of the lesions (1.59, 1.57 and 1.52 mm; respectively) were smaller than in SiUB (2.38, 2.26 and 2.33 mm; respectively) and in StUB (2.36, 2.28 and 2.14 mm; respectively, all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although bipolar biparietal bidirectional RF ablation results in smaller lesions than uniparietal bipolar and unipolar ablation, their capacity to penetrate the tissue is much higher. Moreover, in uniparietal RF applications, the energy spreads in the superficial layers of the tissue but fails to penetrate. Therefore, the degree of transmurality is much higher when using such a 'truly bipolar' ablation approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matteucci et al. (2021) studied Cardiac ablation. Simultaneous biparietal bidirectional bipolar (SBB) radiofrequency ablation vs. Simultaneous uniparietal bipolar (SiUB) and staged uniparietal bipolar (StUB) ablation was evaluated on Transmural lesions. Simultaneous biparietal bidirectional bipolar radiofrequency ablation achieved transmural lesions in 90% of cases, compared to 0% with simultaneous or staged uniparietal bipolar and unipolar ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: