Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MUCH has been written in recent years about the property interests of patients in commercial products developed from human cell lines.1 2 3 4 Most of these commentaries have been rendered obsolete by a recent ruling of the Supreme Court of California. In a long-awaited decision in Moore v. Regents of the University of California,5 a majority of the court denied that the patient, Moore, had any property interest in his discarded tissue, which consisted mainly of tissue removed from his spleen in a therapeutic procedure to retard his leukemia, plus blood, bone marrow, and sperm contributed over time. All the tissues . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William J. Curran (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: