Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To investigate the influence of distal implant angulation and telescopic crown design on the biomechanical behavior of maxillary tooth-implant-supported overdentures using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Eight finite element models were developed, varying by telescopic crown design (buffered vs. non-buffered) and distal implant angulation (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°). A dynamic masticatory load (150 N) was applied, and von Mises stress and displacement were evaluated. The buffered crown design generally reduced peak stress compared to the non-buffered design. Stress was primarily concentrated in the cortical bone around the implant neck and the cervical area of the natural tooth. Among the tested angulations, the 30° inclination model tended to show lower overall stress and displacement. A buffered telescopic crown design appears to improve the biomechanical performance of tooth-implant-supported overdentures. Under the specific geometric assumptions of the present model, an implant inclination of 30° may offer a favorable biomechanical compromise between stress distribution and displacement, suggesting its potential utility in anatomically compromised posterior maxillae.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: