Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carbon prices respond asynchronously to energy, financial, and international carbon-market signals, yet existing graph-based forecasting methods rarely encode these lead–lag structures as directed priors while retaining sample-level adaptability. This study proposes TLCC-DyG-STFusion, a dual-stream forecasting framework in which time-lagged cross-correlation constructs a sparse directed association prior and a learnable coefficient fuses that prior with a sample-level dynamic graph before spatiotemporal encoding. The framework was evaluated on the Hubei and Guangdong pilot markets using 68 rolling test blocks and direct 1-, 3-, and 5-step forecasts. It achieved the lowest five-seed mean root mean squared error in all six market–horizon settings. Harvey–Leybourne–Newbold-corrected Diebold–Mariano tests with Holm adjustment remained significant in 56 of 60 baseline comparisons. Configuration-level ablations favored the full model in all six settings, while single-seed hyperparameter sweeps showed relative RMSE changes from −4.65% to +2.13%. Independently recomputed prior-graph evidence showed high adjacent-window rank continuity (Spearman means of 0.858 in Hubei and 0.929 in Guangdong) while longer-span factor composition changed, supporting a stable-but-adaptive interpretation rather than a causal one. The results demonstrate broad cross-market competitiveness for the same framework while delimiting four comparisons in which adjusted significance was not established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: