Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While crop responses are inherently stage-dependent, machine learning yield models often rely on weather variables aggregated over the entire growing season. This study evaluates how within-season temporal aggregation of weather variables affects both predictive performance and interpretability in machine learning-based rice yield modeling. Using CYGMA (Crop Yield Growth Model with Assumptions on Climate and Socioeconomics)-simulated potential yield as a synthetic response variable, we minimized confounding effects from observational noise and management variability, enabling a clearer evaluation of the role of within-season weather aggregation. Daily weather variables were averaged over the rice growing period after dividing each season into multiple equal-length segments, and several machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using temporally independent validation. Increasing within-season temporal resolution improved model performance up to a moderate level, after which gains diminished. Interpretation using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and response diagnostics consistently indicated that yield sensitivity concentrates in specific windows of the season, with temperature-related effects emerging most strongly early in the season and humidity-related effects later. Finer temporal aggregation sharpened the identification of window-specific nonlinear and threshold-like responses that were obscured under coarse seasonal averages. Overall, moderate within-season aggregation provides a practical balance between predictive skill and mechanistic interpretability, supporting more reliable identification of phenology-relevant meteorological risks for climate-impact assessment and decision support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: