Endotracheal intubation often induces rapid increases in blood pressure and heart rate due to sympathetic stimulation. Remimazolam has recently emerged as an alternative induction agent with a lower incidence of postinduction hypotension than propofol; however, the optimal remifentanil effect-site concentration ( Ce ) required to suppress intubation-induced hemodynamic responses during remimazolam induction remains unknown. This prospective, double-blinded clinical trial aimed to estimate the Ce of remifentanil required to inhibit hemodynamic responses to intubation during remimazolam anesthesia. Thirty-four adult patients undergoing elective surgery were enrolled. All patients received remimazolam and target-controlled infusion of remifentanil, and tracheal intubation was performed using a videolaryngoscope. The Ce was determined using Dixon’s up-and-down sequential allocation method. A positive response was defined as a > 20% increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) or heart rate (HR) at 1 min after intubation compared with baseline. EC 50 and EC 95 values were estimated using isotonic regression and the pooled-adjacent violators algorithm. Based on the responses of the 30 patients included in the primary analysis, the EC 50 and EC 95 of remifentanil were estimated as 5.70 ng/mL (83% CI, 5.50–6.00) and 6.40 ng/mL (95% CI, 6.00–6.50), respectively. No patient experienced bradycardia or hypotension requiring treatment. These findings provide preliminary estimates of the remifentanil EC 50 and EC 95 during remimazolam induction; however, the EC 95 should be interpreted cautiously and prospectively validated. Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), KCT0008697. Registered 10 August 2023. Retrospectively registered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: