Published estimates of the water used by a single AI chatbot prompt differ by roughly a hundredfold, from about 0.3 mL to 50 mL. Most of that spread comes from four choices that are rarely stated together: when the measurement was made, where the accounting boundary is drawn, what unit of work is measured, and whose data centre is assumed. This note sets out the method behind a public calculator and an open-source server that estimate the water and energy of AI use for individuals, coding and agent sessions, exported chat histories and organisations. The method is energy-first. Energy per prompt comes from 2025 vendor disclosures (0.34 Wh for a typical text prompt), and water is derived from energy under one of two stated boundaries: onsite cooling only (1.0 mL per Wh) or comprehensive, which adds water consumed in generating the electricity (4.1 mL per Wh). A token-based extension, calibrated to the same 0.34 Wh prompt, covers sessions in which the model re-reads a growing context. Every result is reported as a central estimate with a likely range of 0.3× to 3×, a judgement-based band that summarises the spread in published energy figures and in provider and grid water intensities. A typical text prompt comes to about 0.34 mL onsite and 1.4 mL comprehensive (range 0.42–4.2 mL). The note gives every constant, worked examples, a reconciliation with widely quoted figures, and the limitations. Results carry the methodology version, and changes are logged publicly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicholas J. Lamb (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: