This study aims to determine whether the divergence between context-free and context-sensitive emoji sentiment scores can serve as a complementary signal for sarcasm detection in Arabic. This phenomenon has received little systematic attention so far. To address this aim, we conducted a multi-scale empirical investigation. At the lexicon level, we compared 1,031 overlapping emoji from two Arabic sentiment resources: the context-sensitive Arab-ESL, derived from 144,196 tweets, and the context-free CF-Arab-ESL, annotated by 53 native speakers across seven Arab regions. At the corpus level, we examined the divergence pattern in a stratified random sample of 199,999 tweets drawn from the 1,414,523-tweet TEAD collection. At the task level, we developed a divergence-augmented transformer architecture by concatenating eight cross-lexicon features with the [CLS] representation produced by three Arabic BERT encoders: MARBERT, AraBERTv2, and CAMeLBERT. We evaluated it on the ArSarcasMoji dataset of 24,630 samples across five random seeds. The results indicate that only 56.8% of overlapping emoji maintain consistent sentiment labels across the two annotation paradigms (W = 91,029, p = 2.44× 10-74, Cohen's d = 0.656). The corpus-level analysis confirms that context-free scores are systematically more positive than their contextual counterparts (d = 1.124, p < 10-300). At the classification level, the divergence-augmented MARBERT achieves the highest mean F1-sarcasm of 0.5234 ± 0.015 across five random seeds, compared with 0.5149 ± 0.017 for the text-only baseline, and the augmentation produces a directionally consistent gain across all three encoders. Ablation analysis shows that continuous divergence scores contribute most of this improvement, whereas binary irony-risk indicators tend to introduce noise at low prevalence. The findings establish cross-lexicon emoji sentiment divergence as a measurable and pervasive feature of Arabic digital discourse, and indicate a modest but directionally consistent benefit when the divergence signal is supplied as a complementary feature for downstream sarcasm detection. A controlled emoji-aware comparison further shows that retaining emoji as input tokens allows encoders whose vocabularies cover emoji to recover the dataset construction rule almost perfectly (F1-sarcasm up to 0.998), which establishes the emoji-token-free protocol adopted here, in which no raw emoji tokens reach the text encoder while emoji-derived lexicon features are retained, as the methodologically sound setting for this corpus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: