Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted youth movement behaviours and mental health, but evidence on post-pandemic trends remains limited. Therefore, this study examined differences in compliance with the 24-hour movement behaviour guidelines and their association with mental health outcomes among Portuguese children and adolescents between 2022 and 2024. Methods: This repeated cross-sectional study included two independent samples of Portuguese children and adolescents from the 2022 and 2024 waves of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study (2022: n = 2775; 2024: n = 2381). The 24-hour movement behaviours (physical activity, sleep and screen time) and mental health outcomes, assessed by Depression Anxiety Stress Scales—21 (DASS-21), were self-reported. Prevalences of attaining the 24-hour movement guidelines and DASS-21 categories were calculated and compared between 2022 and 2024 using chi-square tests. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to examine the associations between movement behaviour compliance and mental health outcomes. Results: From 2022 to 2024, the proportion meeting physical activity (7.5% to 13.7%; p < 0.001) and screen-time (12.8% to 28.2%; p < 0.001) guidelines increased, while adherence to sleep recommendations did not differ significantly (42.4% to 41.2%; p = 0.365). The proportion meeting two or more guidelines was also higher in 2024 (9.5% to 20.1%; p < 0.001). The prevalence of mild-to-extremely severe symptoms was lower in 2024 than in 2022 for depression (34.2% to 43.9%; p < 0.001), anxiety (38.1% to 43.2%; p = 0.001) and stress (23.6% to 31.0%; p < 0.001). Meeting screen-time and sleep guidelines was associated with at least 31% lower odds of having depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms (p < 0.001). Conclusions: More favourable prevalence estimates for movement behaviours and mental health outcomes were observed in 2024 than in 2022. Compliance with screen-time and sleep guidelines was associated with lower odds of depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ribeiro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: