Underground loading and haulage productivity reflects interactions among production, equipment utilization, delays, and maintenance. This study developed an interpretable multivariable framework for forecasting next-calendar-day equipment productivity at an underground mine in Pataz, Peru. We processed 15,955 operational events, yielding 742 equipment-day observations from two dump trucks and three load–haul–dump machines. Equipment-specific series were chronologically divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. SARIMAX, XGBoost, Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN), and Temporal Fusion Transformer models were optimized using four expanding-window folds and compared with naïve persistence. The TCN recorded the lowest aggregate errors: mean absolute error (MAE) = 5.865 t/h, root mean squared error (RMSE) = 11.250 t/h, symmetric mean absolute percentage error (sMAPE) = 38.78%, and mean absolute scaled error (MASE) = 1.257, reducing benchmark MAE and RMSE by 10.4% and 22.0%, respectively. However, model differences were not statistically significant. Predictive performance was moderate ( R 2 = 0.53 ), and the TCN tended to smooth abrupt changes, overpredict near-zero productivity, and underpredict some extreme values. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) identified temporal trend, material moved, and recent equipment utilization as the most influential predictors. Cross-conformal intervals achieved 91.60% empirical coverage against the nominal 95%. Although retained because it recorded the lowest aggregate errors, the TCN should be interpreted alongside uncertainty intervals, equipment status, and operational expertise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandoval-Carranza et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: