Purpose: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for pediatric hepatic steatosis and developed a multivariable model to estimate magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from ultrasound and clinical variables.Methods: This single-center retrospective study included pediatric patients who underwent UGAP measurement and MRI-PDFF assessment within 3 months of each other.UGAP performance in detecting moderate-to-severe (≥S2) and severe (S3) steatosis was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).Multivariable models were developed using linear regression and a random forest algorithm with five-fold cross-validation.Results: Among 45 patients (33 male and 12 female; median age, 12 years), median UGAP and MRI-PDFF values were 0.83 dB/cm/MHz and 22%, respectively.UGAP correlated moderately with MRI-PDFF (ρ=0.596,P<0.001).The AUC was 0.74 for both ≥S2 and S3 steatosis (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.58 to 0.91 and 0.60 to 0.89, respectively), and two discordant cases were identified.A model incorporating UGAP, age, height, and liver size outperformed UGAP alone in detecting ≥S2 steatosis (optimism-corrected AUC, 0.882 vs. 0.744; P=0.01).In the machine learning analysis, the model showed stable performance during cross-validation, with an AUC of 0.789 (95% CI, 0.649 to 0.928) for ≥S2 steatosis and an R 2 of 0.663 for continuous MRI-PDFF prediction.Conclusion: UGAP correlated moderately with MRI-PDFF and showed fair performance in grading pediatric hepatic steatosis.Combining UGAP with clinical parameters significantly improved MRI-PDFF estimation, providing a practical screening tool for hepatic steatosis when MRI is unavailable.External validation is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: